Cited by 3Health and Medical EducationICT in Developing CommunitiesInnovations in Medical Education

The Application of the ADDIE Model and the Training Cycle in the Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Training Program on Data Use for Decision-making among End-users of Electronic Health Information System

Open access
Guevarra, Jonathan P., Ongkeko Jr., Arturo M., Antonio, Carl Abelardo T., Bermudez, Amiel Nazer C., Fernandez–Marcelo, Portia H.·2020·Acta Medica Philippina

Abstract

Objective. This paper describes the process utilized in developing a training program on data use for decision making tailored for real-time monitoring of maternal and child health indicators through Community Health Information Tracking System (rCHITS) end-users in selected areas in the Philippines. Methods. Guided by the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation) model and the training cycle, existing records and reports lodged with the National Telehealth Center (NTHC) pertaining to rCHITS were reviewed, supplemented by interviews with the technical staff of the NTHC and discussion with healthcare workers. Training design was developed, training modules and materials were prepared, critiqued, revised and finalized. The training was implemented and evaluated using an evaluation tool designed for this specific capability-building endeavor. Results. A tailored training program on data use for decision-making was designed for rCHITS end-users in select areas in the Philippines. The process of developing the training program was guided by the ADDIE Model and the Training Cycle. Training was delivered to a total of 128 public health workers. Majority of the participants gave high evaluation on the clarity and relevance of objectives, discussion of topics, methods of delivery, and time devoted in addressing issues (range 3.5-3.8 out of highest possible score of 4). Conclusion. This paper demonstrates the utility of the ADDIE Model and the Training Cycle in developing a training program aimed at enhancing the capability of the field personnel in utilizing the data generated from rCHITS in decision-making. Training participants must also be monitored and evaluated in their workplace setting in order to determine if the concepts and principles covered during the training program are put into practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47895/amp.vi0.2449

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results of Guevarra et al. (2021) demonstrated the value and reliability of the ADDIE model in developing a training programme to improve staff capacity.

    “By c omparing participants' ratings with follow -up data showing improvement in their decisionmaking capacity, the results demonstrated the value and reliability of the ADDIE model in developing a training programme to improve staff capacity.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guevarra, J. P., Ongkeko Jr., A. M., Antonio, C. A. T., Bermudez, A. N. C., & Fernandez–Marcelo, P. H.
Affiliations
University of the Philippines Manila (PH)
Corresponding author
Guevarra, Jonathan P.
Venue
Acta Medica Philippina
Published
2020-12-13
ISSN
  • 0001-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 2094-9278
OpenAlex
W3112372267
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Acta Medica Philippina (publishedVersion)
Funders
UNICEF
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
ADDIE model, training cycle, training program design, electronic health information systems, maternal and child health indicators, real-time health monitoring, capability development, training evaluation, Philippines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review