Cited by 6Machine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesReliability and Maintenance OptimizationMulti-Criteria Decision Making

Selection Criteria for Evaluating Predictive Maintenance Techniques for Rotating Machinery using the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP)

Open access
Prommachan, Wirunpuch, Surin, Prayoon, Srinoi, Pramot, Pipathattakul, Manop·2024·Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research

Abstract

A primary industry objective is to ensure that machinery remains operational through effective management. Predictive maintenance plays a significant role in monitoring the working condition of machinery. The goal of this study is to establish the criteria for evaluating predictive maintenance techniques for rotating machines utilizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). To achieve this target, survey data were collected from questionnaires and interviews with 20 experts, which had at least 20 years of professional experience. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was utilized for criteria selection. The findings disclosed that predictive maintenance factors for rotating machines were ranked as follows: vibration analysis (45.5%), acoustic analysis (22.7%), oil analysis (22.4%), infrared thermography (5.8%), and wear particle analysis (3.6%). The Consistency Ratio (CR) was determined to be less than 10%, indicating a high level of consensus among the experts. Given the elevated importance attributed to vibration analysis, it can be concluded that the latter is the primary criterion for selecting predictive maintenance techniques for rotating machines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.48084/etasr.6816

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. S. Selcuk, "Predictive maintenance, its implementation and latest trends," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 231, no. 9, pp. 1670-1679, Jul. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405415601640. · DOI
  2. I. Lopes, M. Figueiredo, and V. Sa, "Criticality Evaluation To Support Maintenance Management of Manufacturing Systems," International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3-18, Mar. 2020, https://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2020-1-248. · DOI
  3. E. C. Ozcan, S. Unlusoy, and T. Eren, "A combined goal programming - AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 78, pp. 1410-1423, Oct. 2017, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.039. · DOI
  4. A. Daghouri, K. Mansouri, and M. Qbadou, "Enhanced Model For Evaluating Information System Success: Determining Critical Criteria," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 3194-3198, Aug. 2018, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2148. · DOI
  5. N. Eursiriwan, V. Panichgarn, D. Rangsan, and U. Warichwattana, "The Selection Criteria of Suitable Location for Weigh Station Establishment Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Kasem Bundit Engineering Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17-33, 2017.
  6. A. J. M. Goossens and R. J. I. Basten, "Exploring maintenance policy selection using the Analytic Hierarchy Process; An application for naval ships," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 142, pp. 31-41, Oct. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.014. · DOI
  7. C. Ponsiglione, M. E. Nenni, G. Castellano, and A. Molisso, "An Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Approach for Indirect Labour Cost Allocation," International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 43-51, Mar. 2018, https://doi.org/ 10.24867/IJIEM-2018-1-105. · DOI
  8. R. Baidya and S. K. Ghosh, "Model for a Predictive Maintenance System Effectiveness Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process as Analytical Tool," IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 1463-1468, Jan. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.293. · DOI
  9. R. Ohta, V. A. P. Salomon, and M. B. Silva, "Selection of industrial maintenance strategy: Classical AHP and fuzzy AHP applications," International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 254-265, Jan. 2018, https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v10i2.551. · DOI
  10. S. Alshehri, "Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods for Ranking Estimation Techniques in Extreme Programming," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 3073-3078, Jun. 2018, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2104. · DOI
  11. A. Anand, R. Kant, D. P. Patel, and M. D. Singh, "Knowledge Management Implementation: A Predictive Model Using an Analytical Hierarchical Process," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 48-71, Mar. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0110-y. · DOI
  12. L. A. Hadidi and M. A. Khater, "Loss prevention in turnaround maintenance projects by selecting contractors based on safety criteria using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)," Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 34, pp. 115-126, Mar. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.01.028. · DOI
  13. M. Balubaid and R. Alamoudi, "Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Multi-Criteria Analysis for Contractor Selection," American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, vol. 5, pp. 581-589, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2015.59058. · DOI
  14. I. Masudin, R. W. Wardana, M. W. T. Wijayanti, and D. P. Restuputri, "Use Ability Website Evalution for Fresh Food Product in SME's Online Business with Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Integration," ASEAN Engineering Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 71-79, Aug. 2023, https://doi.org/ 10.11113/aej.v13.19159. · DOI
  15. C. Scheffer and P. Girdhar, Practical Machinery Vibration Analysis and Predictive Maintenance. Burlington, MA, USA: Elsevier, 2004.
  16. S. Punia Sindhu, V. Nehra, and S. Luthra, "Recognition and prioritization of challenges in growth of solar energy using analytical hierarchy process: Indian outlook," Energy, vol. 100, pp. 332-348, Apr. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.091. · DOI
  17. M. Z. Syed et al., "Prioritization of Occupational Accident Causes in the Automotive Manufacturing," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 8718-8722, Jun. 2022, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4774. · DOI
  18. S. Z. M. Dawal, N. Yusoff, H.-T. Nguyen, and H. Aoyama, "Multi- attribute decision-making for CNC Machine Tool Selection in FMC based on The Integration of The Improved Consistent Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS," ASEAN Engineering Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 15-31, 2013.
  19. H. A. Abdel Khalek, R. F. Aziz, and A. H. Abdeen, "Identify and prioritize the major influencing causes of automated concrete mixing system for mega construction projects using analytic hierarchy process," Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 3451-3461, Dec. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.04.003. · DOI
  20. A. Pathania and G. Rasool, "Investigating E tailer's perceived Website Quality using Analytical Hierarchy Process Technique," Procedia Computer Science, vol. 122, pp. 1016-1023, Jan. 2017, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.468. · DOI
  21. S. N. F. Zuraidi, M. A. A. Rahman, and Z. A. Akasah, "A Study of using AHP Method to Evaluate the Criteria and Attribute of Defects in Heritage Building," E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 65, 2018, Art. no. 01002, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186501002. · DOI
  22. K. B. Eckert and P. V. Britos, "Proposed extended analytic hierarchical process for selecting data science methodologies," Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 49-58, Apr. 2021, https://doi.org/10.24215/16666038.21.e6. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prommachan, W., Surin, P., Srinoi, P., & Pipathattakul, M.
Affiliations
  • Pathumwan Institute of Technology (TH)
  • Kasem Bundit University (TH)
Venue
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
Published
2024-02-08
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
13058-13065
ISSN
  • 1792-8036 (ISSN-L)
  • 2241-4487
OpenAlex
W4391691330
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Keywords
predictive maintenance, rotating machinery, criteria selection, analytic hierarchy process, vibration analysis, acoustic analysis, oil analysis, infrared thermography, wear particle analysis, expert survey, condition monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review