The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Characterizing Heavy-Tailed Distributions Induced by Retransmissions
Open accessAbstract
Consider a generic data unit of random size L that needs to be transmitted over a channel of unit capacity. The channel availability dynamics is modeled as an i.i.d. sequence {A, A_i},i>0 that is independent of L. During each period of time that the channel becomes available, say A_i, we attempt to transmit the data unit. If Lx] and P[A>x] impacts the distributions of N and T. In particular, we discover several functional criticality points that separate classes of different functional behavior of the distribution of N. We also discuss the engineering implications of our results on communication networks since retransmission strategy is a fundamental component of the existing network protocols on all communication layers, from the physical to the application one.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When data sizes have infinite support, retransmission-based protocols can cause heavy-tailed behavior and possibly zero throughput even if data sizes and channel failures are light-tailed.
“Recent work has shown that, when data sizes have infinite support, retransmissions can cause long (-tailed) delays even if all traffic and network characteristics are light-tailed.”
From Distribution of the Number of Retransmissions of Bounded Documents (2015) · cites this paper as [16]
Corollary 1 is an immediate consequence of Theorem 3 and represents a small generalization of Theorem 2.1 of [16].
“The following corollary is an immediate consequence of Theorem 3 and it represents a small generalization of Theorem 2.1 of [16].”
From Distribution of the Number of Retransmissions of Bounded Documents (2015) · cites this paper as [16]
The retrieved passage from §4.6, “Proof of Theorem 2.5” (page unavailable), discusses a lemma based on Nagaev’s results. Searches for Corollary 1, Theorem 3, and the claimed generalization of Theorem 2.1 of [16] found no passage in our copy addressing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- [1][1] L. N. Andersen and S. Asmussen. Parallel computing, failure recovery, and extreme values. July 2007, preprint.
- [2][2] S. Asmussen, P. Fiorini, L. Lipsky, T. Rolski, and R. Sheahan. Asymptotic behavior of total times for jobs that must start over if a failure occurs. June 2007, preprint.
- [3][3] D. P. Bertsekas and R. Gallager. Data Networks. Prentice Hall, 2 edition, 1992.
- [4][4] N. H. Bingham, C. M. Goldie, and J. L. Teugels. Regular Variation, volume 27. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
- [5][5] P. M. Fiorini, R. Sheahan, and L. Lipsky. On unreliable computing systems when heavy-tails appear as a result of the recovery procedure. In MAMA 2005 Workshop, Banff, AB, Canada, June 2005; ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp. 15-17, September 2005.
- [6][6] P. Jelenković and P. Momčilović. Large deviation analysis of subexponential waiting times in a processor sharing queue. Mathematics of Operations Research, 28(3):587–608, 2003.
- [7][7] P. Jelenković and P. Momčilović. Large deviations of square root insensitive random sums. Math- ematics of Operations Research, 29(2):398–406, 2004.
- [8][8] P. R. Jelenković. Network multiplexer with truncated heavy-tailed arrival streams. In IEEE INFOCOM'99, volume 2, pages 625–632, New York, NY, March 1999.
- [9][9] P. R. Jelenković and J. Tan. Is ALOHA causing power law delays? In Proeedings of the 20th In- ternational Teletraffic Congress, Ottawa, Canada, June 2007; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No 4516, pp. 1149-1160, Springer-Verlag, 2007. (Best Student Paper Award).
- [10][10] P. R. Jelenković and J. Tan. Are end-to-end acknowlegements causing power law delays in large multi-hop networks? In 14th Informs Applied Probability Conference, Eindhoven, July 9-11 2007.
- [11][11] P. R. Jelenković and J. Tan. Can retransmissions of superexponential documents cause subexpo- nential delays? In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'07, pages 892–900, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, (submitted August 2006, accepted November 2006), May 2007.
- [13][13] P. R. Jelenković and J. Tan. Dynamic packet fragmentation for wireless channels with failures. July 2007, preprint. 38
- [14][14] V. Kulkarni, V. Nicola, and K. Trivedi. The completion time of a job on a multimode system. Advances in Applied Probability, 19(4):932–954, December 1987.
- [15][15] S. V. Nagaev. Large deviations of sums of independent random variables. The Annals of Probability, 7(5):745–789, 1979.
- [16][16] T. S. Rappaport. Wireless communications: principles and practise. Prentice Hall, 2 edition, January 2002.
- [17][17] S. M. Ross. A First Course in Probability. Prentice Hall, 6th edition, 2002.
- [18][18] R. Sheahan, L. Lipsky, P. M. Fiorini, and S. Asmussen. On the completion time distribution for tasks that must restart from the beginning if a failure occurs. In MAMA 2006 Workshop, Saint-Malo, France, June 2006; ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp. 24-26, December 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Distribution of the Number of Retransmissions of Bounded Documents
Jelenković, P. R., & Skiani, E. D. (2015) · Advances in Applied Probability · doi:10.1239/aap/1435236982 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Jelenkovic, P. R., & Tan, J.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- ORCID
- Tan, Jian
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2007
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 0709.1138
- OpenAlex
- W4394660891
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2012: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0435168)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Probability and Risk Models
- Keywords
- heavy-tailed distributions, retransmission, packet retransmission, channel availability, communication protocols, queueing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
