PreprintCited by 9Wireless Networks and ProtocolsNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlIoT Networks and Protocols

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Stability of Finite Population ALOHA with Variable Packets

Open access
Jelenkovic, Predrag R., Tan, Jian·2009·arXiv

Abstract

ALOHA is one of the most basic Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols and represents a foundation for other more sophisticated distributed and asynchronous MAC protocols, e.g., CSMA. In this paper, unlike in the traditional work that focused on mean value analysis, we study the distributional properties of packet transmission delays over an ALOHA channel. We discover a new phenomenon showing that a basic finite population ALOHA model with variable size (exponential) packets is characterized by power law transmission delays, possibly even resulting in zero throughput. These results are in contrast to the classical work that shows exponential delays and positive throughput for finite population ALOHA with fixed packets. Furthermore, we characterize a new stability condition that is entirely derived from the tail behavior of the packet and backoff distributions that may not be determined by mean values. The power law effects and the possible instability might be diminished, or perhaps eliminated, by reducing the variability of packets. However, we show that even a slotted (synchronized) ALOHA with packets of constant size can exhibit power law delays when the number of active users is random. From an engineering perspective, our results imply that the variability of packet sizes and number of active users need to be taken into consideration when designing robust MAC protocols, especially for ad-hoc/sensor networks where other factors, such as link failures and mobility, might further compound the problem.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.0902.4481

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [1][1] N. Abramson. The Aloha system - another alternative for computer communications. In Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference , pages 281-285, 1970. -
  2. [2][2] S. Bellini and F. Borgonovo. On the throughput of an ALOHA channel with variable length packets. IEEE Transactions on Communications , 28:1932-1935, Nov. 1980. -
  3. [3][3] D. P. Bertsekas and R. Gallager. Data Networks . Prentice Hall, 2nd edition, 1992. -
  4. [4][4] M. J. Ferguson. An approximate analysis of delay for fixed and variable length packets in an unslotted ALOHA channel. IEEE Transactions on Communications , 25:644-654, July 1977. -
  5. [5][5] P. M. Fiorini, R. Sheahan, and L. Lipsky. On unreliable computing systems when heavy-tails appear as a result of the recovery procedure. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review , 33(2):15-17, September 2005. -
  6. [6][6] P. R. Jelenkovi´ c and J. Tan. Can retransmissions of superexponential documents cause subexponential delays? In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'07 , Anchorage, Alaska, USA, May 2007. -
  7. [7][7] P. R. Jelenkovi´ c and J. Tan. Characterizing heavy-tailed distributions induced by retransmissions. Technical report, Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, EE2007-09-07, September 2007. Eprint arXiv: 0709.1138v2. - · arXiv
  8. [8][8] P. R. Jelenkovi´ c and J. Tan. Is ALOHA causing power law delays? In Proceedings of the 20th International Teletraffic Congress , Ottawa, Canada, June 17-21 2007. Best Student Paper Award. -
  9. [9][9] V. Naware, G. Mergen, and L. Tong. Stability and delay of finite user slotted ALOHA with multipacket reception. 51(7):2636-2656, July 2005. -
  10. [10][10] R. Rom and M. Sidi. Multiple access protocols: performance and analysis . Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1990. -
  11. [11][11] M. Schwartz. Telecommunication networks: protocols, modeling and analysis . Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 1986. -
  12. [12][12] R. Sheahan, L. Lipsky, P. Fiorini, and S. Asmussen. On the completion time distribution for tasks that must restart from the beginning if a failure occurs. MAMA 2006 Workshop, Saint-Malo, France , June 2006.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Jelenkovic, P. R., & Tan, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2009
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1805562818
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Networks and Protocols
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
Keywords
medium access control, packet transmission delay, stability conditions, variable packet size, slotted ALOHA, throughput, ad hoc networks, sensor networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review