On the "principle of the quantumness", the quantumness of Relativity, and the computational grand-unification
Open accessAbstract
After reviewing recently suggested operational "principles of the quantumness", I address the problem on whether Quantum Theory (QT) and Special Relativity (SR) are unrelated theories, or instead, if the one implies the other. I show how SR can be indeed derived from causality of QT, within the computational paradigm "the universe is a huge quantum computer", reformulating QFT as a Quantum-Computational Field Theory (QCFT). In QCFT SR emerges from the fabric of the computational network, which also naturally embeds gauge invariance. In this scheme even the quantization rule and the Planck constant can in principle be derived as emergent from the underlying causal tapestry of space-time. In this way QT remains the only theory operating the huge computer of the universe. Is QCFT only a speculative tautology (theory as simulation of reality), or does it have a scientific value? The answer will come from Occam's razor, depending on the mathematical simplicity of QCFT. Here I will just start scratching the surface of QCFT, analyzing simple field theories, including Dirac's. The number of problems and unmotivated recipes that plague QFT strongly motivates us to undertake the QCFT project, since QCFT makes all such problems manifest, and forces a re-foundation of QFT.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [1]1. G. M. D'Ariano, in Philosophy of quantum information and entanglement , A. Bokulich and G. Jaeger eds., (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 2010). Also arXive 0807.4383.
- [3]3. T. Yu Cao, Conceptual Developments of the 20th Century Field Theories (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK 1997)
- [4]4. P. Teller, An Interpretative Introduction to Quantum Field Theory , (Princeton University Press, Princeton 1995)
- [5]5. S Abramsky and B Coecke, Proceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 415 425 (2004).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum field as a quantum cellular automaton: The Dirac free evolution in one dimension
Bisio, A., D’Ariano, G. M., & Tosini, A. (2015) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.12.016 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- D'Ariano, G. M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2010
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1001.1088
- OpenAlex
- W2951398936
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- special relativity, quantum mechanics, causality, computational universe, emergent spacetime, emergent Planck constant, emergent quantization, gauge invariance, Dirac equation, unification of fundamental forces, foundations of quantum field theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review