PreprintCited by 1Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsMicro and Nano RoboticsMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology

Reynolds number limits for jet propulsion: A numerical study of simplified jellyfish

Open access
Herschlag, Gregory, Miller, Laura A.·2010·arXiv

Abstract

The Scallop Theorem states that reciprocal methods of locomotion, such as jet propulsion or paddling, will not work in Stokes flow (Reynolds number = 0). In nature the effective limit of jet propulsion is still in the range where inertial forces are significant. It appears that almost all animals that use jet propulsion swim at Reynolds numbers (Re) of about 5 or more. Juvenile squid and octopods hatch from the egg already swimming in this inertial regime. The limitations of jet propulsion at intermediate Re is explored here using the immersed boundary method to solve the two-dimensional Navier Stokes equations coupled to the motion of a simplified jellyfish. The contraction and expansion kinematics are prescribed, but the forward and backward swimming motions of the idealized jellyfish are emergent properties determined by the resulting fluid dynamics. Simulations are performed for both an oblate bell shape using a paddling mode of swimming and a prolate bell shape using jet propulsion. Average forward velocities and work put into the system are calculated for Reynolds numbers between 1 and 320. The results show that forward velocities rapidly decay with decreasing Re for all bell shapes when Re < 10. Similarly, the work required to generate the pulsing motion increases significantly for Re < 10. When compared actual organisms, the swimming velocities and vortex separation patterns for the model prolate agree with those observed in Nemopsis bachei. The forward swimming velocities of the model oblate jellyfish after two pulse cycles are comparable to those reported for Aurelia aurita, but discrepancies are observed in the vortex dynamics between when the 2D model oblate jellyfish and the organism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1010.3357

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oblate jellyfish typically swim at St > 1.

    “Oblate jellyfish, however, typically swim at St &gt; 1 [28, 29].”

    From Measurements and modeling of swimming speed dependence on stroke frequency in scyphozoan jellyfish (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

    Section 4.2 compares oblate jellyfish swimming distances per contraction, while Section 3.1 reports results by Reynolds number. Searches for Strouhal number and St found no passage stating that oblate jellyfish typically swim at St > 1. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. D. H. Acheson. Elementary Fluid Dynamics. University Press, Oxford, 1990.
  2. S. Alben and M. Shelley. Coherent locomotion as an attracting state for a free flapping body. PNAS, 102(32):11163-11166, 2005.
  3. S. V. Boletsky, M. Fuentes, and N. Offner. First recording of spawming and embry- onic development in Octopus macropus (Mollusca:Cephalopoda). Journal of Marine Biological Association of the UK, 81:703-704, 2001.
  4. S. P. Colin and J. H. Costello. Morphology, swimming performance and propulsive mode of six co-occuring hydromedusae. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205:427-437, 2002.
  5. R. Cortez and M. Minion. The blob projection method for immersed boundary problems. Journal of Computational Physics, 161:428-453, 2000.
  6. J. O. Dabiri, S. P. Colin, and J. H. Costello. Fast-swimming hydromedusae exploit velar kinematics to form an optimal vortex wake. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209:2025-2033, 2006.
  7. J. O. Dabiri, S. P. Colin, J. H. Costello, and M. Gharib. Flow patterns generated by oblate medusa jellyfish: field measurements and laboratory analyses. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208:1257-1265, 2005.
  8. T. L. Daniel. Cost of locomotion: Unsteady medusan swimming. Journal of Experi- mental Biology, 199:149-164, 1985.
  9. S. H. D. Haddock. Comparative feeding behavior of planktonic ctenophores. Integrative and Comparative Biology, pages 1-7, 2007.
  10. C. W. Hargitt and G. T. Hargitt. Studies in the development of scyphomedusae. Journal of Morphology, 21:217-262, 1910.
  11. M. J. McHenry and J. Jed. The ontogenetic scaling of hydrodynamics and swimming performance in jellyfish (Aurelia aurita). Journal of Experimental Biology, 206:4125- 4137, 2003.
  12. L. A. Miller and C. S. Peskin. When vortices stick: An aerodynamic transition in tiny insect flight. J. Exp. Biol., pages 3073-3088, 2004.
  13. K. Mohseni and M. Sahin. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian formulation for the nu- merical simulation of flow patterns generated by the hydromedusa Aequorea Victoria. Journal of Computational Physics, 228, 2009.
  14. C. S. Peskin and D. M. McQueen. Fluid dynamics of the heart and its valves. In H. G. Othmer, F. R. Adler, M. A. Lewis, and J. C. Dallon, editors, Case Studies in Mathematical Modeling: Ecology, Physiology, and Cell Biology. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 2nd edition, 1996.
  15. A. J. Southward. Observations on the ciliary currents of the jelly-fish Aurelia aurita L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 34:201-216, 1955.
  16. H. Zhao, J. B. Freund, and R. D. Moser. A fixed-mesh method for incompressible flow- structure systems with finite solid deformations. Journal of Computational Physics, 227, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herschlag, G., & Miller, L. A.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2010
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952301024
Cited by
0
References
6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0854961)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Micro and Nano Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Keywords
jellyfish swimming, jet propulsion, scallop theorem, Stokes flow, paddling, vortex separation, Aurelia aurita, immersed boundary method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review