CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 127Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models

Operator Dictionaries and Wave Functions in AdS/CFT and dS/CFT

Open access
Harlow, Daniel, Stanford, Douglas·2011·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1104.2621arXiv 1104.2621
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Dual AdS/CFT correlators can be computed in two ways: differentiate the bulk partition function with respect to boundary conditions, or extrapolate bulk correlation functions to the boundary. These dictionaries were conjectured to be equivalent by Banks, Douglas, Horowitz, and Martinec. We revisit this question at the level of bulk path integrals, showing that agreement in the presence of interactions requires careful treatment of the renormalization of bulk composite operators. By contrast, we emphasize that proposed dS/CFT analogues of the two dictionaries are inequivalent. Next, we show quite generally that the wave function for Euclidean AdS analytically continues to the dS wave function with Euclidean initial conditions. Most of our arguments consider interacting fields on a fixed background, but in a final section we discuss the inclusion of bulk dynamical gravity.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1104.2621

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harlow, D., & Stanford, D.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2011
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1104.2621
arXiv
1104.2621
OpenAlex
W1627839004
Cited by
127
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Keywords
AdS/CFT correspondence, dS/CFT correspondence, boundary conditions, wave functions, analytic continuation, interacting fields, dynamical gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review