PreprintCited by 2Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

Combining Kepler and HARPS Occurrence Rates to Infer the Period-Mass-Radius Distribution of Super-Earths/Sub-Neptunes

Open access
Wolfgang, A., Laughlin, G.·2011·arXiv

Abstract

The ongoing High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Search (HARPS) has found that 30-50% of GK dwarfs in the solar neighborhood host planets with sub-Neptune masses in orbits of P < 50 days. At first glance, this overall occurrence rate seems inconsistent with the planet frequency measured during Q0-Q2 of the Kepler Mission, whose 1,235 detected planetary candidates imply that ~ 15% of main sequence dwarfs harbor short-period planets with R_pl < 4 R_Earth. A rigorous comparison between the two surveys is difficult, however, as they observe different stellar populations and measure different planetary properties. Here we report the results of a Monte Carlo study that can account for this discrepancy via plausible distributions of planetary compositions. We find that a population concurrently consisting of (1) dense silicate-iron planets and (2) low-density gas-dominated worlds provides a natural fit to the current data. In this scenario, the fraction of dense planets decreases with increasing mass, from f_rocky = 90% at M = 1 M_Earth to f_rocky = 10% at M = 17 M_Earth. Our best fit population has a total occurrence rate of 40% for 2 < P < 50 days and 1 < M < 17 M_Earth, and is characterized by simple power-law indices of the form N(M)dM ~ M^alpha dM and N(P)dP ~ P^beta dP with alpha = -1.0 and beta = 0.0. Our model population therefore contains four free parameters and is readily testable with future observations. Furthermore, our model's insistence that at least two distinct types of planets must exist in the survey data indicates that multiple formation mechanisms are at work to produce the population of planets commonly referred to as "super-Earths".

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1108.5842

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analyses of mass-radius relationships suggest a break point around 1.7 Earth radii (~5 Earth masses); above that size, increasingly larger planets have a composition increasingly dominated by H2/He gas.

    “The analyses of these relationships suggest a “break point” around 1.7 Earth radii (∼5 Earth masses); above that size, increasingly larger planets have a composition that is increasingly dominated by H2/He gas.”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Wolfgang and Laughlin, 2011

    Section 3.2.2 (pp. 4–5) models rocky and gaseous planet populations and allows gas-envelope fractions to vary, supporting the broad link between mass–radius relationships and composition. It does not identify a break at 1.7 Earth radii (about 5 Earth masses) or conclude that planets above it become increasingly dominated by H2/He; its rocky–gaseous mixture varies across the modeled mass range. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., Everett, M. E., &amp; Esquerdo, G. A. 2011, arXiv:1102.0342 · arXiv
  2. Demory, B. -., et al. 2011, arXiv:1105.0415 · arXiv
  3. Ford, E. B., et al. 2011, arXiv:1102.0544 · arXiv
  4. Gautier, T. N., III, et al. 2010, arXiv:1001.0352 · arXiv
  5. Hansen, B. M. S., &amp; Murray, N. 2011, arXiv:1105.2050 · arXiv
  6. Ho, S., &amp; Turner, E. L. 2010, arXiv:1003.4738 · arXiv
  7. -. 2011, arXiv:1103.2541 http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.2541 · arXiv
  8. Jenkins, J. M., et al. 2010, Proc. SPIE, 7740
  9. Lissauer, J. J., et al. 2011, Nature, 470, 53 -. 2011, arXiv:1102.0543 · arXiv
  10. Lovis, C., Mayor, M., Bouchy, F., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., Udry, S., Benz, W., &amp; Mordasini, C. 2009, IAU Symposium, 253, 502
  11. Moorhead, A. V., et al. 2011, arXiv:1102.0547 · arXiv
  12. Morton, T. D., &amp; Johnson, J. A. 2011, arXiv:1101.5630 · arXiv
  13. Rogers, L. A., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., &amp; Seager, S. 2011, arXiv:1106.2807 · arXiv
  14. Rupprecht, G., et al. 2004, Proc. SPIE, 5492, 148
  15. Schneider, J., Dedieu, C., Le Sidaner, P., Savalle, R., &amp; Zolotukhin, I. 2011, arXiv:1106.0586 · arXiv
  16. Tremaine, S., &amp; Dong, S. 2011, arXiv:1106.5403 · arXiv
  17. S´ egransan, D., et al. 2011, arXiv:1107.0339 · arXiv
  18. Winn, J. N., et al. 2011, arXiv:1104.5230 · arXiv
  19. Wittenmyer, R. A., Tinney, C. G., Butler, R. P., O'Toole, S. J., Jones, H. R. A., Carter, B. D., Bailey, J., &amp; Horner, J. 2011, arXiv:1103.4186 · arXiv
  20. Wright, J. T., et al. 2010, arXiv:1012.5676 · arXiv
  21. Youdin, A. N. 2011, arXiv:1105.1782 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolfgang, A., & Laughlin, G.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2011
Volume
2011
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1525173610
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0809125)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX09AF08G, NAS 526555)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (NAS5- 26555, 26555)
  • Ames Research Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
super-Earths, sub-Neptunes, planet occurrence rate, Kepler mission, terrestrial planets, planetary composition, short-period planets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review