The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets XXXIV. Occurrence, mass distribution and orbital properties of super-Earths and Neptune-mass planets
Open accessAbstract
We report on the results of an 8-year survey carried out at the La Silla Observatory with the HARPS spectrograph to detect and characterize planets in the super-Earth and Neptune mass regime. The size of our star sample and the precision achieved with HARPS have allowed the detection of a sufficiently large number of low-mass planets to study the statistical properties of their orbital elements, the correlation of the host-star metallicity with the planet masses, as well as the occurrence rate of planetary systems around solar-type stars. A robust estimate of the frequency of systems shows that more than 50% of solar-type stars harbor at least one planet of any mass and with period up to 100 days. Different properties are observed for the population of planets less massive than about 30M-Earth compared to the population of gaseous giant planets. The mass distribution of Super-Earths and Neptune-mass planets (SEN) is strongly increasing between 30 and 15M-Earth. The SEN occurence rate does not exhibit a preference for metal rich stars. Most of the SEN planets belong to multi-planetary systems. The orbital eccentricities of the SEN planets seems limited to 0.45. At the opposite, the occurence rate of gaseous giant planets is growing with the logarithm of the period, and is strongly increasing with the host-star metallicity. About 14% of solar-type stars have a planetary companion more massive than 50M-Earth? on an orbit with a period shorter than 10 years. Orbital eccentricities of giant planets are observed up to 0.9 and beyond. The precision of HARPS-type spectrographs opens the possibility to detect planets in the habitable zone of solar-type stars. Identification of a significant number of super-Earths orbiting solar-type of the Sun vicinity is achieved by Doppler spectroscopy. 37 newly discovered planets are announced in the Appendix of this paper, among which 15 Super-Earths.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
About one in ten giant planet systems contains a hot Jupiter, with the giant planet occurrence rate dropping sharply within 200 days.
“About one in ten giant planet systems contains a hot Jupiter (Howard et al. 2010, Mayor et al. 2011, cf Wright et al. 2012 and Guo et al. 2017 regarding the apparent discrepancy between RV surveys and Kepler HJ occurrence rates), with the giant planet occurrence rate dropping sharply within 200 days (Fig. 4).”
From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Mayor et al. 2011
Section 4.2 (pp. 7–8) estimates hot gaseous giants at 0.89% of surveyed stars and gaseous giants at 13.9%, implying roughly one hot giant per 16 giant-planet systems rather than one in ten. The paper says giant-planet occurrence rises with orbital period, but it does not identify a sharp change at 200 days. In the citing sentence, that specific cutoff is accompanied by a reference to its own Fig. 4. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Andrae, R., Schulze-Hartung, T., & Melchior, P. 2010, ArXiv e-prints
- Cummings, J. & Deliyannis, C. P. 2007, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 38, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 837-+
- Kaltenegger, L., Udry, S., & Pepe, F. 2011b, ArXiv e-prints
- Lovis, C., Dumusque, X., Santos, N. C., et al. 2011a, ArXiv e-prints
- Lovis, C., Mayor, M., Bouchy, F., et al. 2009, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 253, IAU Symposium, 502-505
- McArthur, B. E., Endl, M., Cochran, W. D., et al. 2004, ApJ Letters, 614, L81
- Pepe, F., Lovis, C., S´ egransan, D., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints
- Sahlmann, J., Segransan, D., Queloz, D., & Udry, S. 2010, ArXiv e-prints
- S´ egransan, D., Mayor, M., Udry, S., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints
- Udry, S., Mayor, M., Queloz, D., Naef, D., & Santos, N. 2000, in From Extrasolar Planets to Cosmology: The VLT Opening Symposium, ed. J. Bergeron & A. Renzini, 571-+
- Wolfgang, A. & Laughlin, G. 2011, ArXiv e-prints Wordsworth, R. D., Forget, F., Selsis, F., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, L48 + Zechmeister, M., K¨ urster, M., & Endl, M. 2009, A&A, 505, 859
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dawson, R. I., & Johnson, J. A. (2018) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051853 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations
Cassan, A., Kubas, D., Beaulieu, J.-P., Dominik, M., Horne, K., Greenhill, J., Wambsganss, J., Menzies, J., Williams, A., Jørgensen, U. G., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10684 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
An Earth-mass planet orbiting α Centauri B
Dumusque, X., Pepe, F., Lovis, C., Ségransan, D., Sahlmann, J., Benz, W., Bouchy, F., Mayor, M., Queloz, D., Santos, N., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11572 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE FREQUENCY OF HOT JUPITERS ORBITING NEARBY SOLAR-TYPE STARS
Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Howard, A. W., Johnson, J. A., Morton, T. D., & Fischer, D. A. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/160 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Kepler-22b: A 2.4 EARTH-RADIUS PLANET IN THE HABITABLE ZONE OF A SUN-LIKE STAR
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Batalha, N., Bryson, S. T., Rowe, J., Fressin, F., Torres, G., Caldwell, D. A., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/2/120 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mayor, M., Marmier, M., Lovis, C., Udry, S., Ségransan, D., Pepe, F., Benz, W., Bertaux, J. L., Bouchy, F., Dumusque, X., Curto, G. L., Mordasini, C., Queloz, D., & Santos, N. C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1109.2497
- OpenAlex
- W1636130649
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 29
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Keywords
- super-Earths, Neptune-mass planets, exoplanet occurrence rates, planet mass distribution, orbital properties, orbital eccentricity, host star metallicity, multi-planet systems, solar-type stars, habitable zone planets, Doppler spectroscopy, HARPS, southern sky survey
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review