PreprintCited by 53Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsNeural Networks and ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Multi-column Deep Neural Networks for Image Classification

Open access
Cireşan, Dan, Meier, Ueli, Schmidhuber, Juergen·2012·arXiv

Abstract

Traditional methods of computer vision and machine learning cannot match human performance on tasks such as the recognition of handwritten digits or traffic signs. Our biologically plausible deep artificial neural network architectures can. Small (often minimal) receptive fields of convolutional winner-take-all neurons yield large network depth, resulting in roughly as many sparsely connected neural layers as found in mammals between retina and visual cortex. Only winner neurons are trained. Several deep neural columns become experts on inputs preprocessed in different ways; their predictions are averaged. Graphics cards allow for fast training. On the very competitive MNIST handwriting benchmark, our method is the first to achieve near-human performance. On a traffic sign recognition benchmark it outperforms humans by a factor of two. We also improve the state-of-the-art on a plethora of common image classification benchmarks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1202.2745

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 53

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. S. Behnke. Hierarchical Neural Networks for Image Interpretation, volume 2766 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2003. 1, 2
  2. Y. Bengio, P. Lamblin, D. Popovici, and H. Larochelle. Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2007. 1, 2
  3. P. R. Cavalin, A. de Souza Britto Jr., F. Bortolozzi, R. Sabourin, and L. E. S. de Oliveira. An implicit segmentation-based method for recognition of handwritten strings of characters. In SAC, pages 836- 840, 2006. 6
  4. D. C. Ciresan, U. Meier, L. M. Gambardella, and J. Schmidhuber. Deep, big, simple neural nets for handwritten digit recognition. Neural Computation, 22(12):3207-3220, 2010. 1, 5
  5. D. C. Ciresan, U. Meier, L. M. Gambardella, and J. Schmidhuber. Convolutional neural network com- mittees for handwritten character classification. In International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pages 1250-1254, 2011. 1, 5
  6. D. C. Ciresan, U. Meier, J. Masci, L. M. Gambardella, and J. Schmidhuber. Flexible, high perfor- mance convolutional neural networks for image classification. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1237-1242, 2011. 1, 2, 4, 5, 8
  7. A. Coates and A. Y. Ng. The importance of encoding versus training with sparse coding and vector quantization. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2011. 8, 10
  8. E. M. Dos Santos, L. S. Oliveira, R. Sabourin, and P. Maupin. Overfitting in the selection of classifier ensembles: a comparative study between pso and ga. In Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pages 1423-1424. ACM, 2008. 6
  9. A. C. P.-A. M. P. V. Dumitru Erhan, Yoshua Bengio and S. Bengio. Why does unsupervised pre- training help deep learning? Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11:625-660, 2010. 1, 2
  10. K. Fukushima. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network for a mechanism of pattern recogni- tion unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics, 36(4):193-202, 1980. 1, 2
  11. S. Hochreiter, Y. Bengio, P. Frasconi, and J. Schmidhuber. Gradient flow in recurrent nets: the difficulty of learning long-term dependencies. In S. C. Kremer and J. F. Kolen, editors, A Field Guide to Dynamical Recurrent Neural Networks. IEEE Press, 2001. 2
  12. D. H. Hubel and T. Wiesel. Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London), 160:106-154, 1962. 2
  13. A. L. Koerich and P. R. Kalva. Unconstrained handwritten character recognition using metaclasses of characters. In Intl. Conf. on Image Processing, pages 542-545, 2005. 6
  14. T. Kohonen. Self-Organization and Associative Memory. Springer, second edition, 1988. 2
  15. A. Krizhevsky. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. Master's thesis, Computer Science Department, University of Toronto, 2009. 1, 7
  16. Y. LeCun. Une procédure d'apprentissage pour réseau a seuil asymmetrique (a learning scheme for asymmetric threshold networks). In Proceedings of Cognitiva 85, pages 599-604, Paris, France, 1985.
  17. Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner. Gradient-based learning applied to document recog- nition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11):2278-2324, November 1998. 1, 2, 3
  18. Y. LeCun, L. D. Jackel, L. Bottou, C. Cortes, J. S. Denker, H. Drucker, I. Guyon, U. A. Muller, E. Sackinger, P. Simard, and V. Vapnik. Learning algorithms for classification: A comparison on handwritten digit recognition. In J. H. Oh, C. Kwon, and S. Cho, editors, Neural Networks: The Statistical Mechanics Perspective, pages 261-276. World Scientific, 1995. 5
  19. C.-L. Liu, F. Yin, D.-H. Wang, and Q.-F. Wang. Chinese Handwriting Recognition Contest. In Chinese Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2010. 1, 6, 7
  20. J. Milgram, M. Cheriet, and R. Sabourin. Estimating accurate multi-class probabilities with support vector machines. In Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, pages 1906-1911, 2005. 6
  21. M. Ranzato, Y.-L. B. Fu Jie Huang, and Y. LeCun. Unsupervised learning of invariant feature hier- archies with applications to object recognition. In Proc. of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2007. 2
  22. M. Ranzato, F. Huang, Y. Boureau, and Y. LeCun. Unsupervised learning of invariant feature hier- archies with applications to object recognition. In Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR'07). IEEE Press, 2007. 5
  23. M. A. Ranzato, C. Poultney, S. Chopra, and Y. Lecun. Efficient learning of sparse representations with an energy-based model. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2006), 2006. 5
  24. M. Riesenhuber and T. Poggio. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat. Neurosci., 2(11):1019-1025, 1999. 2
  25. D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams. Learning internal representations by error prop- agation. In Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations, pages 318-362. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986. 2
  26. R. Salakhutdinov and G. Hinton. Learning a nonlinear embedding by preserving class neighborhood structure. In Proc. of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, volume 11, 2007. 2
  27. D. Scherer, A. Müller, and S. Behnke. Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for object recognition. In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, 2010. 10
  28. P. Sermanet and Y. LeCun. Traffic sign recognition with multi-scale convolutional networks. In Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN'11), 2011. 17
  29. T. Serre, L. Wolf, S. M. Bileschi, M. Riesenhuber, and T. Poggio. Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 29(3):411-426, 2007. 2
  30. P. Y. Simard, D. Steinkraus, and J. C. Platt. Best practices for convolutional neural networks ap- plied to visual document analysis. In Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pages 958-963, 2003. 1, 2, 5
  31. J. Stallkamp, M. Schlipsing, J. Salmen, and C. Igel. The German Traffic Sign Recognition Bench- mark: A multi-class classification competition. In International Joint Conference on Neural Net- works, 2011. 1, 7
  32. D. Strigl, K. Kofler, and S. Podlipnig. Performance and scalability of gpu-based convolutional neural networks. Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing, Euromicro Conference on, 0:317- 324, 2010. 1
  33. R. Uetz and S. Behnke. Large-scale object recognition with CUDA-accelerated hierarchical neural networks. In IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems (ICIS), 2009. 1
  34. P. J. Werbos. Beyond Regression: New Tools for Prediction and Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. PhD thesis, Harvard University, 1974. 2
  35. D. J. Willshaw and C. von der Malsburg. How patterned neural connections can be set up by self- organization. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 194:431-445, 1976.

Authors
Cireşan, D., Meier, U., & Schmidhuber, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2012
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951128674
Cited by
53
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission (270247)
  • FP7 Information and Communication Technologies
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
convolutional neural networks, image classification, handwritten digit recognition, traffic sign recognition, biologically inspired neural architecture, MNIST, ensemble forecasting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review