CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 10Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchHistory and Developments in Astronomy

Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler, III: Analysis of the First 16 Months of Data

Open access
Batalha, Natalie M., Rowe, Jason F., Bryson, Stephen T., Barclay, Thomas, Burke, Christopher J., Caldwell, Douglas A., Christiansen, Jessie L., Mullally, Fergal +64 more·2012·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1202.5852arXiv 1202.5852
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

New transiting planet candidates are identified in sixteen months (May 2009 - September 2010) of data from the Kepler spacecraft. Nearly five thousand periodic transit-like signals are vetted against astrophysical and instrumental false positives yielding 1,091 viable new planet candidates, bringing the total count up to over 2,300. Improved vetting metrics are employed, contributing to higher catalog reliability. Most notable is the noise-weighted robust averaging of multi-quarter photo-center offsets derived from difference image analysis which identifies likely background eclipsing binaries. Twenty-two months of photometry are used for the purpose of characterizing each of the new candidates. Ephemerides (transit epoch, T_0, and orbital period, P) are tabulated as well as the products of light curve modeling: reduced radius (Rp/R*), reduced semi-major axis (d/R*), and impact parameter (b). The largest fractional increases are seen for the smallest planet candidates (197% for candidates smaller than 2Re compared to 52% for candidates larger than 2Re) and those at longer orbital periods (123% for candidates outside of 50-day orbits versus 85% for candidates inside of 50-day orbits). The gains are larger than expected from increasing the observing window from thirteen months (Quarter 1-- Quarter 5) to sixteen months (Quarter 1 -- Quarter 6). This demonstrates the benefit of continued development of pipeline analysis software. The fraction of all host stars with multiple candidates has grown from 17% to 20%, and the paucity of short-period giant planets in multiple systems is still evident. The progression toward smaller planets at longer orbital periods with each new catalog release suggests that Earth-size planets in the Habitable Zone are forthcoming if, indeed, such planets are abundant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1202.5852

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NASA's Kepler mission has discovered thousands of planet candidates (3786 according to exoplanets.org on May 30, 2016) using the photometric transit method, including planets similar in size to Earth, planets potentially in the habitable zone, many multiplanet systems, and planets in binary star systems.

    “NASA's Kepler mission has discovered thousands of planet candidates (3786 according to exoplanets.org on May 30, 2016) using the photometric transit method, including planets similar in size to Earth (Fressin et al., 2012), planets potentially in the habitable zone, many multiplanet systems (Borucki et al., 2011; Batalha et al., 2012), and planets in binary star systems.”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Batalha et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Cox, A.N. 2000, Allen's astrophysical quantities , 4th ed. Publisher: New York: AIP Press; Springer, Edited by by Arthur N. Cox
  2. Ford, E., Ragozzine, D., Rowe, J.F., et al. 2012, arXiv: 1201.1892, submitted to ApJ · arXiv
  3. Howard, A.W. et al. 2011, arXiv:1103.2541 · arXiv
  4. Jenkins, J. M. et al, 2010a, Proc. SPIE 7740, 77400D
  5. Lissauer,J. J. et al. 2012, arXiv:1201.5424 · arXiv
  6. Muirhead, P.S et al., 2012, arXiv:1201.2189 · arXiv
  7. Press, W.H. Teukolsky, S.A. Vetterling, W.T. Flannery, B.P. 1992, Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77 Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 678
  8. Quintana, E. V. et al. 2010, Proc. SPIE 7740, 77401X
  9. Schmidt-Kaler, T. 1982, in Landolt-B¨ ornstein New Series, Group 6, Vol. 2b, Stars and Star Clusters, ed. K. Schaifers & H.-H. Voigt (Berlin: Springer)
  10. Steffen, J., et al. 2012b, arXiv:1201.1873, submitted to ApJ · arXiv
  11. Tenenbaum, P. et al. 2012, arXiv:1201.1048, accepted by ApJS · arXiv
  12. Twicken, J. D. et al. 2010a, Proc. SPIE 7740, 774023
  13. Twicken, J. D. et al. 2010b, Proc. SPIE 7740, 77401U
  14. Wu, H., Twicken, J.D., Tenenbaum, P., Clarke, B.D., Li, J., Quintana, E.V., Allen, C., Chandrasekaran, H., Jenkins, J.M, Caldwell, D.A., Wohler, B., Girouard, F., McCauliff, S., Cote, M.T., Klaus, T.C. 2010, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy, Proceedings of the SPIE, eds. Radziwill, N.M.; Bridger, A., 7740, 42

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Barclay, T., Burke, C. J., Caldwell, D. A., Christiansen, J. L., Mullally, F., Thompson, S. E., Brown, T. M., Dupree, A. K., Fabrycky, D. C., Ford, E. B., Fortney, J. J., Gilliland, R. L., Isaacson, H., Latham, D. W., Marcy, G. W., Quinn, S., Ragozzine, D., Shporer, A., Borucki, W. J., Ciardi, D. R., Gautier, T. N., Haas, M. R., Jenkins, J. M., Koch, D. G., Lissauer, J. J., Rapin, W., Basri, G. S., Boss, A. P., Buchhave, L. A., Charbonneau, D., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Clarke, B. D., Cochran, W. D., Demory, B.-O., Devore, E., Esquerdo, G. A., Everett, M., Fressin, F., Geary, J. C., Girouard, F. R., Gould, A., Hall, J. R., Holman, M. J., Howard, A. W., Howell, S. B., Ibrahim, K. A., Kinemuchi, K., Kjeldsen, H., Klaus, T. C., Li, J., Lucas, P. W., Morris, R. L., Prsa, A., Quintana, E., Sanderfer, D. T., Sasselov, D., Seader, S. E., Smith, J. C., Steffen, J. H., Still, M., Stumpe, M. C., Tarter, J. C., Tenenbaum, P., Torres, G., Twicken, J. D., Uddin, K., Van Cleve, J., Walkowicz, L., & Welsh, W. F.
Affiliations
  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, San Jose State University
  • SETI Institute/NASA Ames Research Center
  • NASA Ames Research Center
  • Bay Area Environmental Research Institute/NASA Ames Research Center
  • Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network
  • Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  • Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California
  • University of Florida
  • Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds, The Pennsylvania State University
  • University of California, Berkeley
  • NASA Exoplanet Science Institute/Caltech
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology
  • Carnegie Institution of Washington
  • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
  • Aarhus University
  • McDonald Observatory, The University of Texas
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • SETI Institute
  • National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  • Orbital Sciences Corporation/NASA Ames Research Center
  • Lawrence Hall of Science
  • Centre for Astrophysics, University of Hertfordshire
  • Villanova University
  • Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics
  • Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University
  • San Diego State University
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2012
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1202.5852
arXiv
1202.5852
OpenAlex
W2154363014
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 5
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Texas Digital Library (University of Texas)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
  • American Astronomical Society
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX08AR04G)
  • Science Mission Directorate
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
exoplanet candidates, Kepler mission, transit photometry, eclipsing binaries, image subtraction, orbital period, planet frequency, multi-planet systems, Earth-sized planets, habitable zone, light curve modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review