PreprintCited by 35Transportation Planning and OptimizationIoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety SystemsRoad Transport and Highway Systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 4 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Implementation of a Real Time Passenger Information System

Open access
Ganesh, K., Thrivikraman, M., Kuri, Joy, Dagale, Haresh, Sudhakar, G., Sanyal, Sugata·2012·arXiv

Abstract

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) are gaining recognition in developing countries like India. This paper describes the various components of our prototype implementation of a Real-time Passenger Information System (RTPIS) for a public transport system like a fleet of buses. Vehicle-mounted units, bus station units and a server located at the transport company premises comprise the system. The vehicle unit reports the current position of the vehicle to a central server periodically via General Packet Radio Service (GPRS). An Estimated Time of Arrival (ETA) algorithm running on the server predicts the arrival times of buses at their stops based on real-time observations of the buses' current Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates. This information is displayed and announced to passengers at stops using station units, which periodically fetch the required ETA from the server via GPRS. Novel features of our prototype include: (a) a route creator utility which automatically creates new routes from scratch when a bus is driven along the new route, and (b) voice tagging of stops and points of interest along any route. Besides, the prototype provides: (i) web-based applications for passengers, providing useful information like a snapshot of present bus locations on the streets, and (ii) web-based analysis tools for the transport authority, providing information useful for fleet management, like number of trips undertaken by a specific bus. The prototype has been demonstrated in a campus environment, with four-wheelers and two-wheelers emulating buses. The automatic real-time passenger information system has the potential of making the public transport system an attractive alternative for city-dwellers, thereby contributing to fewer private vehicles on the road, leading to lower congestion levels and less pollution.

Overview

CoChat Summary

Written by AI from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper describes a prototype Real-Time Passenger Information System (RTPIS) that uses GPS/GPRS vehicle units, bus-stop station units, and a central server to predict and disseminate bus arrival times. It contributes a route-creation utility, voice tagging of stops, an ETA algorithm, web/SMS interfaces, and a server-load/fleet-size estimate.

Key findings

  • The prototype was demonstrated in the Indian Institute of Science campus with four-wheelers and two-wheelers emulating buses; the test route ran between CEDT and DGATE, with stops including CEDT, Guest House, ECE, DGATE, SBI, Library, Café, and SERC.
  • The route-creation utility uses a piecewise linear approximation with a linearity-error threshold of 25 m; stops are always included regardless of the linearity constraint, and existing nodes/links are reused if within 25 m.
  • The ETA algorithm updates link travel times using weighted averages: 90% previous and 10% current for average velocity, and 70% previous and 30% current for average link travel time, with an update rate of two per minute in trial runs.
  • For a typical case of 100 links per route, 10 buses per route, and 2000 stops, with scale factors α≈10, β≈1, γ≈6, δ≈1, the estimated capacity is about R≈91 routes and B≈910 buses; the summary states deployment for approximately 1000 buses, 100 routes, and 2000 stops.

Methods

  • The system comprises vehicle-mounted units, bus-station units, and a central server; vehicle units compute GPS position and transmit latitude, longitude, and speed periodically via GPRS, while station units fetch ETA from the server via GPRS and display/announce it.
  • The server maintains database tables for buses, positions, logs, nodes, links, routes, and stops; the ETA algorithm has a link updater that estimates link travel times and an ETA calculator that sums link travel times from the nearest bus to each stop.
  • The paper evaluates server load using big-O query complexity and converts it to a fleet-size estimate under stated assumptions: server capacity 30,000 queries/min, bus position update rate 2/min, ETA calculation rate 1/min, SMS queries 20/min, website queries 50/min, and station-unit queries 1/min.

Limitations

  • The paper does not include an explicit limitations section; it only notes future work on Denial of Service (DoS) attacks and security, and on extending the methodology to other fleet movement.
  • Evident from the text: the prototype was demonstrated in a campus environment with four-wheelers and two-wheelers emulating buses, not with an actual city bus fleet.
  • Evident from the text: the fleet-size estimate depends on assumed query rates, scale factors, and a server capacity number obtained experimentally from continuous updates covering one route, so it may not generalize directly to other deployments.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1206.0447

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

23 Own result · 18 Own interpretation · 6 No basis given · 3 Own method · 1 No full text of the sources · 1 Not checked yet

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 35
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 19

Create a free account to see these claims.

Create a free account to see these assumptions.

7 more claims

Create a free account to see all 52 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2][2] 'Review of Current Passenger Information Systems', Prepared for the INFOPOLIS 2 Project (No. TR 4016), Deliverable 1, WP03, Infopolis 2 Consortium, August 1998. -

Cited by

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Ganesh, K., Thrivikraman, M., Kuri, J., Dagale, H., Sudhakar, G., & Sanyal, S.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
  • Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2012
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1576669481
Cited by
35
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Indian Institute of Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › IoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Road Transport and Highway Systems
Keywords
bus transit, intelligent transportation systems, estimated time of arrival, GPS vehicle tracking, GPRS communication, fleet management, web application

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review