The Transfer of Entanglement: The Case for Firewalls
Open accessAbstract
Black hole complementarity requires that the interior of a black hole be represented by the same degrees of freedom that describe its exterior. Entanglement plays a crucial role in the reconstruction of the interior degrees of freedom. This connection is manifest in "two-sided" eternal black holes. But for real black holes which are formed from collapse there are no second sides. The sense in which horizon entropy is entanglement entropy is much more subtle for one-sided black holes. It involves entanglement between different parts of the near-horizon system. As a one-sided black hole evaporates the entanglement that accounts for its interior degrees of freedom disappears, and is gradually replaced by entanglement with the outgoing Hawking radiation. A principle of "transfer of entanglement" can be formulated. According to the argument of Almheiri, Marolf, Polchinski and Sully, it is when the transfer of entanglement is completed at the Page time, that a firewall replaces the horizon. Alternatives to firewalls may suffer contradictions which are similar to those of time travel. The firewall hypothesis would be similar to Hawking's chronology protection conjecture.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 73
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- [2][2] P. Hayden and J. Preskill, 'Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems,' JHEP 0709 (2007) 120 [arXiv:0708.4025 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
- [3][3] Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, 'Fast Scramblers,' JHEP 0810 , 065 (2008) [arXiv:0808.2096 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
- [4][4] L. Susskind, 'Addendum to Fast Scramblers,' arXiv:1101.6048 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
- [5][5] N. Lashkari, D. Stanford, M. Hastings, T. Osborne and P. Hayden, 'Towards the Fast Scrambling Conjecture,' arXiv:1111.6580 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
- [6][6] B. Freivogel and L. Susskind, 'A Framework for the landscape,' Phys. Rev. D 70 , 126007 (2004) [hep-th/0408133]. R. Bousso and L. Susskind, 'The Multiverse Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,' Phys. Rev. D 85 , 045007 (2012) [arXiv:1105.3796 [hep-th]]. G. Horowitz, A. Lawrence and E. Silverstein, 'Insightful D-branes,' JHEP 0907 , 057 (2009) [arXiv:0904.3922 [hep-th]]. I. Heemskerk, D. Marolf and J. Polchinski, 'Bulk and Transhorizon Measurements in AdS/CFT,' arXiv:1201.3664 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
- [7][7] A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, 'Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?,' arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
- [8][8] L. Susskind, 'Singularities, Firewalls, and Complementarity,' arXiv:1208.3445 [hepth]. - · arXiv
- [9][9] M. B. Plenio and S. Virmani, 'An Introduction to entanglement measures,' Quant. Inf. Comput. 7 , 1 (2007) [quant-ph/0504163]. - · arXiv
- [11][11] J. M. Maldacena, 'Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,' JHEP 0304 , 021 (2003) [hep-th/0106112]. - B. Czech, J. L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, 'Rindler Quantum - · arXiv
- [12][12] Gravity,' arXiv:1206.1323 [hep-th]. B. Czech, J. L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, 'The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix,' Class. Quant. Grav. 29 , 155009 (2012) [arXiv:1204.1330 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
- [15][15] G. 't Hooft, gr-qc/9310026. - · arXiv
- [16][16] R. Bousso, 'Observer Complementarity Upholds the Equivalence Principle,' arXiv:1207.5192 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
- [17][17] D. Harlow, 'Complementarity, not Firewalls,' arXiv:1207.6243 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
- [18][18] Y. Nomura, J. Varela and S. J. Weinberg, 'Complementarity Endures: No Firewall for an Infalling Observer,' arXiv:1207.6626 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
- [19][19] S. D. Mathur and D. Turton, 'Comments on black holes I: The possibility of complementarity,' arXiv:1208.2005 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
- [20][20] B. D. Chowdhury and A. Puhm, 'Is Alice burning or fuzzing?,' arXiv:1208.2026 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
- [21][21] T. Banks and W. Fischler, 'Holographic Space-Time Does Not Predict Firewalls,' arXiv:1208.4757 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
- Authors
- Susskind, L.
- Corresponding author
- Susskind, Leonard
- ORCID
- Susskind, Leonard
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2012
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1210.2098
- OpenAlex
- W1623961760
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Keywords
- black hole firewalls, black hole complementarity, entanglement transfer, Page time, entanglement entropy, horizon entropy, Hawking radiation, black hole evaporation, eternal black holes, chronology protection conjecture, black hole information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review