PreprintCited by 58Sparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sketched SVD: Recovering Spectral Features from Compressive Measurements

Open access
Gilbert, Anna C., Park, Jae Young, Wakin, Michael B.·2012·arXiv

Abstract

We consider a streaming data model in which n sensors observe individual streams of data, presented in a turnstile model. Our goal is to analyze the singular value decomposition (SVD) of the matrix of data defined implicitly by the stream of updates. Each column i of the data matrix is given by the stream of updates seen at sensor i. Our approach is to sketch each column of the matrix, forming a "sketch matrix" Y, and then to compute the SVD of the sketch matrix. We show that the singular values and right singular vectors of Y are close to those of X, with small relative error. We also believe that this bound is of independent interest in non-streaming and non-distributed data collection settings. Assuming that the data matrix X is of size Nxn, then with m linear measurements of each column of X, we obtain a smaller matrix Y with dimensions mxn. If m = O(k ε^{-2} (log(1/ε) + log(1/δ)), where k denotes the rank of X, then with probability at least 1-δ, the singular values σ'_j of Y satisfy the following relative error result (1-ε)^(1/2)<= σ'_j/σ_j <= (1 + ε)^(1/2) as compared to the singular values σ_j of the original matrix X. Furthermore, the right singular vectors v'_j of Y satisfy ||v_j-v_j'||_2 <= min(sqrt{2}, (ε\sqrt{1+ε})/(\sqrt{1-ε}) max_{i\neq j} (\sqrt{2}σ_iσ_j)/(min_{c\in[-1,1]}(|σ^2_i-σ^2_j(1+cε)|))) as compared to the right singular vectors v_j of X. We apply this result to obtain a streaming graph algorithm to approximate the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the graph Laplacian in the case where the graph has low rank (many connected components).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1211.0361

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19][19] G. H. Golub and C. F. van Van Loan. Matrix Computations (Johns Hopkins Studies in Mathematical Sciences)(3rd Edition) . The Johns Hopkins University Press, 3rd edition, Oct. 1996. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 58

Metadata

Authors
Gilbert, A. C., Park, J. Y., & Wakin, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Colorado School of Mines (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2012
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1612884251
Cited by
57
References
28
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Matrix Theory and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Keywords
sketching, singular value decomposition, streaming algorithms, compressed sensing, relative error bounds, right singular vectors, graph Laplacian, eigenvalue approximation, distributed data collection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review