The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Stochastic Gradient Descent for Non-smooth Optimization: Convergence Results and Optimal Averaging Schemes
Abstract
Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) is one of the simplest and most popular stochastic optimization methods. While it has already been theoretically studied for decades, the classical analysis usually required non-trivial smoothness assumptions, which do not apply to many modern applications of SGD with non-smooth objective functions such as support vector machines. In this paper, we investigate the performance of SGD without such smoothness assumptions, as well as a running average scheme to convert the SGD iterates to a solution with optimal optimization accuracy. In this framework, we prove that after T rounds, the suboptimality of the last SGD iterate scales as O(log(T)/\sqrt{T}) for non-smooth convex objective functions, and O(log(T)/T) in the non-smooth strongly convex case. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first bounds of this kind, and almost match the minimax-optimal rates obtainable by appropriate averaging schemes. We also propose a new and simple averaging scheme, which not only attains optimal rates, but can also be easily computed on-the-fly (in contrast, the suffix averaging scheme proposed in Rakhlin et al. (2011) is not as simple to implement). Finally, we provide some experimental illustrations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We find that a learning rate of 1.0 with the SGD [84] optimizer is a good approach for stable training.”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [84]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhao, Z., Feng, C., Yang, H. H., & Luo, X. (2020) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.001.1900370 · Cited by 125
Distributed stochastic optimization and learning
Shamir, O., & Srebro, N. (2014) · 2014 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton) · doi:10.1109/allerton.2014.7028543 · Cited by 120
Self-citationWISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models
Wang, P., Li, Z., Zhang, N., Xu, Z., Yao, Y., Jiang, Y., Xie, P., Huang, F., & Chen, H. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.14768 · Cited by 19
Shuffled Model of Federated Learning: Privacy, Communication and Accuracy Trade-offs
Girgis, A. M., Data, D., Diggavi, S., Kairouz, P., & Suresh, A. T. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.07180 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Shamir, O., & Zhang, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2012
- arXiv
- 1212.1824
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.