The DOI matches its DataCite record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representation
Open accessAbstract
This paper investigates domain generalization: How to take knowledge acquired from an arbitrary number of related domains and apply it to previously unseen domains? We propose Domain-Invariant Component Analysis (DICA), a kernel-based optimization algorithm that learns an invariant transformation by minimizing the dissimilarity across domains, whilst preserving the functional relationship between input and output variables. A learning-theoretic analysis shows that reducing dissimilarity improves the expected generalization ability of classifiers on new domains, motivating the proposed algorithm. Experimental results on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that DICA successfully learns invariant features and improves classifier performance in practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Nonlinear Component Analysis as a Kernel Eigenvalue Problem
Schölkopf, B., Smola, A. J., & Müller, K. (1998) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976698300017467 · Cited by 8,196
Self-citationDomain Adaptation via Transfer Component Analysis
Pan, S. J., Tsang, I. W.-H., Kwok, J. T.-Y., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2010.2091281 · Cited by 4,809
A theory of learning from different domains
Ben-David, S., Blitzer, J., Crammer, K., Kulesza, A., Pereira, F., & Vaughan, J. W. (2010) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-009-5152-4 · Cited by 3,515
Sliced Inverse Regression for Dimension Reduction
Li, K.-C. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1991.10475035 · Cited by 2,122
Analysis of Representations for Domain Adaptation
Ben-David, S., Blitzer, J., Crammer, K., & Pereira, F. (2007) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0022 · Cited by 2,019
Learning in the Presence of Concept Drift and Hidden Contexts
Widmer, G., & Kubat, M. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1018046501280 · Cited by 1,857
Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces in Probability and Statistics
Berlinet, A. F., & Thomas‐Agnan, C. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9096-9 · Cited by 1,610
Dataset Shift in Machine Learning
(2008) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262170055.001.0001 · Cited by 1,553
Argyriou, A., Evgeniou, T., & Pontil, M. (2007) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0010 · Cited by 1,376
A Hilbert Space Embedding for Distributions
Smola, A. J., Gretton, A., Song, L., & Schölkopf, B. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75225-7_5 · Cited by 792
Self-citationHilbert Space Embeddings and Metrics on Probability Measures
Sriperumbudur, B. K., Gretton, A., Fukumizu, K., Schölkopf, B., & Lanckriet, G. R. G. (2010) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/1756006.1859901 · Cited by 501
Self-citationDiscriminative Learning Under Covariate Shift
Bickel, S., Brückner, M., & Scheffer, T. (2009) · doi:10.5555/1577069.1755858 · Cited by 320
(2011) · Cited by 277
Learning the Shared Subspace for Multi-task Clustering and Transductive Transfer Classification
Gu, Q., & Zhou, J. (2009) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2009.32 · Cited by 157
Kernel Sliced Inverse Regression with Applications to Classification
Wu, H. (2008) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/106186008x345161 · Cited by 118
Learning from Distributions via Support Measure MachinesPreprint
Muandet, K., Fukumizu, K., Dinuzzo, F., & Schölkopf, B. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1202.6504 · Cited by 91
Self-citationBrinkman, R. R., Gasparetto, M., Lee, S.-J. J., Ribickas, A. J., Perkins, J. B., Janssen, W. E., Smiley, R., & Smith, C. A. (2007) · Transplantation and Cellular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.02.002 · Cited by 79
Universal Kernels on Non-Standard Input Spaces
Christmann, A., & Steinwart, I. (2010) · Cited by 63
Flexible Modeling of Latent Task Structures in Multitask LearningPreprint
Passos, A., Rai, P., Wainer, J., & Daumé, H. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1206.6486 · Cited by 39
Central Subspace Dimensionality Reduction Using Covariance Operators
Kim, M., & Pavlović, V. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.111 · Cited by 22
Kernel Dimensionality Reduction for Supervised Learning
Fukumizu, K., Bach, F., & Jordan, M. I. (2003) · Cited by 21
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalization
Li, D., Yang, Y., Song, Y.-Z., & Hospedales, T. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11596 · Cited by 1,374
Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalization
Li, D., Yang, Y., Song, Y.-Z., & Hospedales, T. M. (2017) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.591 · Cited by 1,341
Domain Generalization with Adversarial Feature Learning
Li, H., Pan, S. J., Wang, S., & Kot, A. C. (2018) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00566 · Cited by 1,291
Domain Generalization: A Survey
Zhou, K., Liu, Z., Qiao, Y., Xiang, T., & Loy, C. C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3195549 · Cited by 1,315
Generalizing to unseen domains: A survey on domain generalization
Wang, J., Lan, C., Liu, C., Ouyang, Y., Qin, T., Lu, W., Chen, Y., Zeng, W., & Yu, P. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3178128 · Cited by 1,046
Metadata
- Authors
- Muandet, K., Balduzzi, D., & Schölkopf, B.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems (DE)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2013
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1301.2115
- OpenAlex
- W2155858138
- Cited by
- 771
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2025: 58 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 147 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Keywords
- domain generalization, cross-domain classification, model generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
