CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 403Neutrino Physics ResearchParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesNuclear physics research studies

Reactor On-Off Antineutrino Measurement with KamLAND

Open access
The KamLAND Collaboration·2013·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1303.4667arXiv 1303.4667
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The recent long-term shutdown of Japanese nuclear reactors has resulted in a significantly reduced reactor $\bar{nu}_{e}$ flux at KamLAND. This running condition provides a unique opportunity to confirm and constrain backgrounds for the reactor $\bar{nu}_{e}$ oscillation analysis. The data set also has improved sensitivity for other $\bar{nu}_{e}$ signals, in particular $\bar{nu}_{e}$'s produced in $β$-decays from $^{238}$U and $^{232}$Th within the Earth's interior, whose energy spectrum overlaps with that of reactor $\bar{nu}_{e}$'s. Including constraints on $θ_{13}$ from accelerator and short-baseline reactor neutrino experiments, a combined three-flavor analysis of solar and KamLAND data gives fit values for the oscillation parameters of $tan^{2} θ_{12} = 0.436^{+0.029}_{-0.025}$, $Δm^{2}_{21} = 7.53^{+0.18}_{-0.18} \times 10^{-5} {eV}^{2}$, and $sin^{2} θ_{13} = 0.023^{+0.002}_{-0.002}$. Assuming a chondritic Th/U mass ratio, we obtain $116^{+28}_{-27}$ $\bar{nu}_{e}$ events from $^{238}$U and $^{232}$Th, corresponding to a geo $\bar{nu}_{e}$ flux of $3.4^{+0.8}_{-0.8} \times 10^{6} {cm^{-2}s^{-1}}$ at the KamLAND location. We evaluate various bulk silicate Earth composition models using the observed geo $\bar{nu}_{e}$ rate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1303.4667

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The neutrino mass-squared differences used in the calculation are m2^2 - m1^2 = 7.53×10^-5 eV^2 and |m3^2 - m2^2| = 2.44×10^-3 eV^2.

    “In our calculation of the Casimir energy, the neutrino masses were chosen numerically as m 2 2 -m 2 1 = 7.53×10 -5 eV 2 , |m 2 3 -m 2 2 | = 2.44×10 -3 eV 2 [43].”

    From Weak gravity conjecture, multiple point principle and the standard model landscape (2017) · cites this paper as [43]

    Section VI reports Δm²₂₁ = 7.53 × 10⁻⁵ eV² from a combined analysis, supporting the first value. The passages from our copy do not give |m²₃ − m²₂| = 2.44 × 10⁻³ eV², so they do not support the second value attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. T. Araki et al., (KamLAND Collaboration), Nature 436, 499 (2005).
  2. A. Gando et al., (KamLAND Collaboration), Nature Geosci. 4, 647 (2011).
  3. G. Bellini et al., (Borexino Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 687, 299 (2010).
  4. S. Goswami and A. Y. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D 72, 053011 (2005).
  5. K. Abe et al., (T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 041801 (2011).
  6. P. Adamson et al., (MINOS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 181802 (2011).
  7. Y. Abe et al., (Double Chooz Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 86, 052008 (2012).
  8. J. K. Ahn et al., (RENO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 191802 (2012).
  9. W. F. McDonough and S.-s. Sun, Chem. Geol. 120, 223 (1995).
  10. R. Arevalo Jr., W. F. McDonough, and M. Luong, Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 278, 361 (2009).
  11. J. H. Davies and D. R. Davies, Solid Earth 1, 5 (2010).
  12. C. Giunti and C. W. Kim, Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2007).
  13. A. Gando et al., (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 85, 045504 (2012).
  14. S. Abe et al., (KamLAND Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 81, 025807 (2010).
  15. S. Enomoto, E. Ohtani, K. Inoue, and A. Suzuki, Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 258, 147 (2007).
  16. B. E. Berger et al., J. Instrum. 4, P04017 (2009).
  17. T. A. Mueller et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 054615 (2011).
  18. P. Huber, Phys. Rev. C 84, 024617 (2011).
  19. K. Schreckenbach, G. Colvin, W. Gelletly, and F. Von Feil- itzsch, Phys. Lett. B 160, 325 (1985).
  20. A. A. Hahn et al., Phys. Lett. B 218, 365 (1989).
  21. G. Mention et al., Phys. Rev. D 83, 073006 (2011).
  22. Y. Declais et al., Phys. Lett. B 338, 383 (1994).
  23. V. I. Kopeikin, L. A. Mikaelyan, and V. V. Sinev, Phys. of At. Nucl. 64, 849 (2001).
  24. J. M. Herndon, Proc. of Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 3047 (2003).
  25. B. T. Cleveland et al., Astrophys. J. 496, 505 (1998).
  26. J. N. Abdurashitov et al., Phys. Rev. C 80, 015807 (2009).
  27. G. Bellini et al., (Borexino Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 141302 (2011).
  28. J. Hosaka et al., (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 73, 112001 (2006).
  29. B. Achkar et al., Phys. Lett. B 374, 243 (1996).
  30. J. M. Herndon and D. A. Edgerley, hep-ph/0501216v4 (2005). · arXiv
  31. G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Palazzo, and A. M. Rotunno, Earth, Moon, and Planets 99, 111 (2006).
  32. S. Enomoto, Earth, Moon, and Planets 99, 131 (2006).
  33. M. Javoy et al., Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 293, 259 (2010).
  34. D. L. Turcotte and G. Schubert, Geodynamics, Applications of Continuum Physics to Geological Problems, second ed. (Cam- bridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2002).
  35. O. Šrámek et al., Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 361, 356 (2013).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The KamLAND Collaboration
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
Volume
88
Issue
3
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1303.4667
arXiv
1303.4667
OpenAlex
W2177534912
Cited by
403
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 10
FWCI
14.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231, No. DE-AC02-05-CH11231, DE AC02 05CH11231, DE-AC02-)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25707014, 23684012, 21000001, 25800123, 25220704)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Neutrino Physics Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
Keywords
KamLAND, reactor antineutrinos, antineutrino oscillations, reactor shutdown, solar neutrinos, theta13, theta12, mass-squared difference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review