The DOI matches its DataCite record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 4 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
What really happened on September 15th 2008? Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs
Open accessAbstract
Combining and summarizing meta-data from various kinds of data sources is one possible solution to the data fragmentation we are suffering from. Multiple projects have addressed this issue already. This paper presents a new approach named Memacs. It automatically generates a detailed linked diary of our digital artifacts scattered across local files of multiple formats as well as data silos of the internet. Being elegantly simple and open, Memacs uses already existing visualization features of GNU Emacs and Org-mode to provide a promising platform for life-logging, Quantified Self movement, and people looking for advanced Personal Information Management (PIM) in general.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Memacs is an open-source system that automatically extracts meta-data from local files and web data silos into Org-mode files, creating a linked diary visualized through GNU Emacs and Org-mode. It is presented as a lightweight, modular alternative to projects like Memex, MyLifeBits, and Lifestreams, illustrated with a hypothetical September 15th 2008 scenario.
Key findings
- Memacs modules generate Org-mode text files from sources including filename timestamps, emails (IMAP, POP3, maildir), RSS feeds, git, iCalendar, CSV, XML, EXIF, smartphone text messages, phone calls, and newsgroup postings.
- Result files hold only meta-data: a timestamp, short summary, tags, and a link to the original data, avoiding duplication.
- The paper’s central demonstration is a hypothetical scenario on September 15th 2008, where Memacs enriches a single calendar event with context: a 1:35 pm text message, a 2:34 pm photograph, a 2:38 pm tweet, a 3:53 pm email, a 4:17 pm saved PDF, and a 5:35 pm phone call.
- Memacs is implemented in Python 2.7 under GNU GPL version 3 and hosted on GitHub; setup is described as a one-time process that “should not take longer than a couple of minutes.”
Methods
- Design: a system/architecture paper describing Memacs modules and Org-mode visualization, not an empirical study.
- Data or sample: no dataset or user sample; the main illustration is a hypothetical real-world scenario involving a tagstore presentation on September 15th 2008.
- Main analysis: qualitative technical description of module behavior, overwrite vs. append modes, and Org-mode Agenda/Sparse Tree visualization features; no formal evaluation or statistical analysis is reported.
Limitations
- The paper does not explicitly state limitations.
- Evident from the text: no user study, performance benchmark, or quantitative evaluation is reported; the September 15th 2008 scenario is explicitly hypothetical.
- Evident from the text: the system depends on GNU Emacs/Org-mode and is implemented in Python 2.7, and its claimed benefits over related work are argued qualitatively rather than tested.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 No basis given · 2 Sources not found
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It automatically generates a detailed linked diary of our digital artifacts scattered across local files of multiple formats as well as data silos of the internet.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 15
- It may state two separate claims as one. 7
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The user sets up a Memacs module only one time.This is a process which should not take longer than a couple of minutes.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3.4 Implementation and Setup
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unlike those projects mentioned, Memacs is based on open source components, is very easily set up, can integrate a bigger number of data sources, and provides additional benefit to the user with no additional cost or effort (besides the one-time setup process).”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3. MEMACS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It did only require surprisingly small implementation effort in order to get functionality similar and even more advanced than huge funded research projects mentioned in the previous section.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3. MEMACS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Memacs modules generate, extract, and/or summarize data from external data sources and produce text-files in Org-mode syntax as shown in Figure 1.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3.2 Memacs Modules
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To avoid unnecessary duplication, only the meta-data is held in Memacs result files.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3.2 Memacs Modules
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unlike those projects mentioned, Memacs is based on open source components, is very easily set up, can integrate a bigger number of data sources, and provides additional benefit to the user with no additional cost or effort (besides the one-time setup process).”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3. MEMACS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using multiple visualization features from Org-mode, Memacs data gives a more complete impression, on the context of digital artifacts.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 5. CONCLUDING REMARKS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Once a user has set up a system like Memacs using minimal effort, huge benefits are noticeable in every day work.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 5. CONCLUDING REMARKS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unlike those projects mentioned, Memacs is based on open source components, is very easily set up, can integrate a bigger number of data sources, and provides additional benefit to the user with no additional cost or effort (besides the one-time setup process).”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3. MEMACS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to an open source license and a very modular design, new modules can be implemented with minimal effort.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3.2 Memacs Modules
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Being elegantly simple and open, Memacs uses already existing visualization features of GNU Emacs and Org-mode to provide a promising platform for life-logging, Quantified Self movement, and people looking for advanced Personal Information Management (PIM) in general.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Memacs collects chunks of meta-data from a variety of local and remote data sources using Memacs modules.This automatism runs in background, with no need for additional manual effort for classification, description, and so on.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 5. CONCLUDING REMARKS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It is an open source project which enables users to accomplish a very large number of things: starting with basic outlining methods, it does provide headings, lists, features from Wiki systems, meta-data management systems, task and project planning, hypertext systems, tagging, workflow management, spreadsheet processing, and many more.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3.1 Org-mode
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Based on text files, it represents a future-proof and platform independent system.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3.1 Org-mode
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Because of its flexibility to include external data and programs, it resembles a viable tool for reproducible research [3] and literate programming [16, 17].”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3.1 Org-mode
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Combining and summarizing meta-data from various kinds of data sources is one possible solution to the data fragmentation we are suffering from.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Data fragmentation is a real problem that people are suffering from.
The paper relies on this without support.
Data fragmentation is a real problem that people are suffering from.
“the data fragmentation we are suffering from”
The paper relies on this without support.
Digital artifacts are not solely stored in files and require application programming interfaces to access.
“It is obvious that our digital artifacts are not solely stored in files.We have to use application programming interfaces (API) to access chunks of data, delivered via different kinds of formats such as XML, JSON, or even binary formats.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 2. RELATED WORK
“The "Rememberance Agent" [13, 15, 14] represented another approach.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > References
“13. D. Huynh, D. R. Karger, and D. Quan. Haystack: A Platform for Creating, Organizing and Visualizing Information Using RDF.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 2. RELATED WORK
“The aim of the "Lifestreams" project [9, 10] was to help users in optimizing their effort and time while managing local files and events.”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > References
“9. S. Dumais, E. Cutrell, J. Cadiz, G. Jancke, R. Sarin, and D. C. Robbins. Stuff I've Seen: a System for Personal Information Retrieval and Re-use.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3.1 Org-mode
“This resembles a similar approach like the Data Soup of the Apple Newton MessagePad PDA [18] or the Haystack project [12].”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > References
“18. E. Schulte, D. Davison, T. Dye, and C. Dominik. A Multi-Language Computing Environment for Literate Programming and Reproducible Research.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 3.1 Org-mode
“Because of its flexibility to include external data and programs, it resembles a viable tool for reproducible research [3] and literate programming [16, 17].”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > References
“16. B. J. Rhodes and P. Maes. Just-in-time information retrieval agents.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > 2. RELATED WORK
“Microsoft Research worked on a project which was later called "MyLifeBits" [11, 1].”
§ Getting The Most from Your Personal Information with Memacs > References
“11. E. Freeman and D. Gelernter. Lifestreams: A Storage Model for Personal Data.”
Citations
Cites
Bush, V. (1945) · Cited by 2,998
Dumais, S., Cutrell, E. B., Cadiz, J. J., Jancke, G., Sarin, R., & Robbins, D. C. (2016) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/2888422.2888425 · Cited by 691
Gemmell, J., Bell, G., & Lueder, R. (2006) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1107458.1107460 · Cited by 536
Dumais, S., Cutrell, E. B., Cadiz, J., Jancke, G., Sarin, R., & Robbins, D. C. (2003) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/860435.860451 · Cited by 381
Lifestreams: a storage model for personal data
Freeman, E., & Gelernter, D. (1996) · SGMD · doi:10.1145/381854.381893 · Cited by 356
Extending document management systems with user-specific active properties
Dourish, P., Edwards, W. K., LaMarca, A., Lamping, J., Petersen, K., Salisbury, M. P., Terry, D. B., & Thornton, J. D. (2000) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/348751.348758 · Cited by 232
Remembrance Agent: A continuously running automated information retrieval system
Rhodes, B. J., & Starner, T. E. (1996) · Cited by 231
Just-in-time information retrieval agents
Rhodes, B. J., & Maes, P. (2000) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.393.0685 · Cited by 226
Dourish, P., Edwards, W. K., LaMarca, A., & Salisbury, M. P. (1999) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/319091.319099 · Cited by 206
Just-in-time information retrieval
Rhodes, B. J., & Maes, P. (2000) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 112
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- G. Bell and J. Gemmell. Total Recall. Dutton, 1st edition, September 2009.
- M. Delescluse, R. Franconville, S. Joucla, T. Lieury, and C. Pouzat. Making neurophysiological data analysis 18 http://twitter.com 19 http://delicious.com reproducible. Why and how? Journal of Physiology Paris, (0), August 2011.
- K. Voit. TagTrees: Improving Personal Information Management using Associative Navigation. Ph.D. thesis, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria, November 2012.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Voit, K.
- Affiliations
- Graz University of Technology (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Voit, Karl
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2013
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1304.1332
- OpenAlex
- W1599256837
- Semantic Scholar
- 0e444cb2ec38a756f813e17f928ee6178457104d
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 18
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Keywords
- personal information management, data fragmentation, metadata aggregation, lifelogging, quantified self, GNU Emacs, digital artifacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
