CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1,310Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

Cool horizons for entangled black holes

Open access
Maldacena, Juan, Susskind, Leonard·2013·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1306.0533arXiv 1306.0533
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

General relativity contains solutions in which two distant black holes are connected through the interior via a wormhole, or Einstein-Rosen bridge. These solutions can be interpreted as maximally entangled states of two black holes that form a complex EPR pair. We suggest that similar bridges might be present for more general entangled states. In the case of entangled black holes one can formulate versions of the AMPS(S) paradoxes and resolve them. This suggests possible resolutions of the firewall paradoxes for more general situations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1306.0533

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Very complex computations in the radiation can create wormholes that reach into the black hole interior and pull out the information stored there.

    “The idea is that very complex computations in the radiation can create wormholes that reach into that interior and pull out the information stored there [70], see also [85,86].”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Conclusion (p. 40) says that radiation can be processed with a quantum computer to produce a second black hole connected to the first by an Einstein–Rosen bridge. Section 5.3 (p. 37) also discusses complex operations on the radiation affecting interior information. Neither passage says those operations pull information out of the interior through a wormhole; the Introduction (p. 3) assumes wormholes remain non-traversable. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 1,310

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. [4][4] J. L. Friedman, K. Schleich and D. M. Witt, 'Topological censorship,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 , 1486 (1993) [Erratum-ibid. 75 , 1872 (1995)] [gr-qc/9305017]. - · arXiv
  2. [5][5] G. J. Galloway, K. Schleich, D. M. Witt and E. Woolgar, 'Topological censorship and higher genus black holes,' Phys. Rev. D 60 , 104039 (1999) [gr-qc/9902061]. - · arXiv
  3. [7][7] J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, 'AdS(3) black holes and a stringy exclusion principle,' JHEP 9812 , 005 (1998) [hep-th/9804085]. - · arXiv
  4. [8][8] G. T. Horowitz and D. Marolf, 'A New approach to string cosmology,' JHEP 9807 , 014 (1998) [hep-th/9805207]. - · arXiv
  5. [9][9] V. Balasubramanian, P. Kraus, A. E. Lawrence and S. P. Trivedi, 'Holographic probes of anti-de Sitter space-times,' Phys. Rev. D 59 , 104021 (1999) [hep-th/9808017]. - · arXiv
  6. [10][10] J. M. Maldacena, 'Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,' JHEP 0304 , 021 (2003) [hep-th/0106112]. - · arXiv
  7. [11][11] A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, 'Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?,' arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  8. [12][12] A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully, 'An Apologia for Firewalls,' arXiv:1304.6483 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  9. [13][13] S. L. Braunstein, 'Black hole entropy as entropy of entanglement, or it's curtains for the equivalence principle', arXiv:0907.1190v1 [quant-ph]. S. L. Braunstein, S. Pirandola and K. Z.yczkowski, 'Entangled black holes as ciphers of hidden information,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 101301 (2013) [arXiv:0907.1190 [quant-ph]]. - · arXiv
  10. [14][14] S. D. Mathur, 'The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction,' Class. Quant. Grav. 26 , 224001 (2009) [arXiv:0909.1038 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  11. [15][15] S. B. Giddings and Y. Shi, 'Quantum information transfer and models for black hole mechanics,' arXiv:1205.4732 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  12. [16][16] K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, 'An Infalling Observer in AdS/CFT,' arXiv:1211.6767 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  13. [17][17] S. G. Avery and B. D. Chowdhury, 'Firewalls in AdS/CFT,' arXiv:1302.5428 [hepth]. - · arXiv
  14. [18][18] D. Harlow and P. Hayden, 'Quantum Computation vs. Firewalls,' arXiv:1301.4504 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  15. [20][20] D. Garfinkle, S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger, 'Entropy in black hole pair production,' Phys. Rev. D 49 , 958 (1994) [gr-qc/9306023]. - · arXiv
  16. [21][21] I. Heemskerk, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, 'Bulk and Transhorizon Measurements in AdS/CFT,' JHEP 1210 , 165 (2012) [arXiv:1201.3664 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  17. [22][22] D. Bak, M. Gutperle and A. Karch, 'Time dependent black holes and thermal equilibration,' JHEP 0712 , 034 (2007) [arXiv:0708.3691 [hep-th]]. D. Bak, M. Gutperle and S. Hirano, 'Three dimensional Janus and time-dependent black holes,' JHEP 0702 , 068 (2007) [hep-th/0701108]. - · arXiv
  18. [23][23] S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, 'Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 , 181602 (2006) [hep-th/0603001]. - · arXiv
  19. [24][24] M. Van Raamsdonk, 'Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,' Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 , 2323 (2010) [Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 19 , 2429 (2010)] [arXiv:1005.3035 [hepth]]. - · arXiv
  20. [25][25] T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, 'Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors,' arXiv:1303.1080 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  21. [26][26] I. A. Morrison and M. M. Roberts, 'Mutual information between thermo-field doubles and disconnected holographic boundaries,' arXiv:1211.2887 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  22. [27][27] D. Marolf and A. C. Wall, 'Eternal Black Holes and Superselection in AdS/CFT,' Class. Quant. Grav. 30 , 025001 (2013) [arXiv:1210.3590 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  23. [28][28] D. Marolf, 'Black Holes, AdS, and CFTs,' Gen. Rel. Grav. 41 , 903 (2009) [arXiv:0810.4886 [gr-qc]]. - · arXiv
  24. [29][29] A. Sen, 'State Operator Correspondence and Entanglement in AdS 2 /CFT 1 ,' Entropy 13 , 1305 (2011) [arXiv:1101.4254 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  25. [30][30] D. N. Page, 'Average entropy of a subsystem,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 , 1291 (1993) [gr-qc/9305007]. D. N. Page, 'Information in black hole radiation,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 , 3743 (1993) [hep-th/9306083]. - · arXiv
  26. [31][31] L. Susskind, 'Black Hole Complementarity and the Harlow-Hayden Conjecture,' arXiv:1301.4505 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  27. [32][32] S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, 'Black holes and the butterfly effect,' arXiv:1306.0622 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  28. [34][34] P. Hayden and J. Preskill, 'Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems,' JHEP 0709 (2007) 120 [arXiv:0708.4025 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  29. [35][35] E. Verlinde and H. Verlinde, 'Black Hole Entanglement and Quantum Error Correction,' arXiv:1211.6913 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  30. [38][38] B. Swingle, 'Constructing holographic spacetimes using entanglement renormalization,' arXiv:1209.3304 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  31. [39][39] J. Polchinski, L. Susskind and N. Toumbas, 'Negative energy, superluminosity and holography,' Phys. Rev. D 60 , 084006 (1999) [hep-th/9903228]. · arXiv

Authors
Maldacena, J., & Susskind, L.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Advanced Study (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Maldacena, Juan
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
Volume
61
Issue
9
Pages
781-811
ISSN
0015-8208 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1306.0533
arXiv
1306.0533
OpenAlex
W2164817854
Cited by
1,310
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 107 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 120 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 43
FWCI
27.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Fortschritte der Physik (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DEFG0290ER40542)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
Einstein-Rosen bridge, wormholes, firewall paradox, maximally entangled states, EPR pairs, black hole information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review