PreprintCited by 215Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFractional Differential Equations SolutionsNumerical methods in inverse problems

The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.

Numerical Approximation of Fractional Powers of Elliptic Operators

Open access

Abstract

We present and study a novel numerical algorithm to approximate the action of $T^β:=L^{-β}$ where $L$ is a symmetric and positive definite unbounded operator on a Hilbert space $H_0$. The numerical method is based on a representation formula for $T^{-β}$ in terms of Bochner integrals involving $(I+t^2L)^{-1}$ for $t\in(0,\infty)$. To develop an approximation to $T^β$, we introduce a finite element approximation $L_h$ to $L$ and base our approximation to $T^β$ on $T_h^β:= L_h^{-β}$. The direct evaluation of $T_h^β$ is extremely expensive as it involves expansion in the basis of eigenfunctions for $L_h$. The above mentioned representation formula holds for $T_h^{-β}$ and we propose three quadrature approximations denoted generically by $Q_h^β$. The two results of this paper bound the errors in the $H_0$ inner product of $T^β-T_h^βπ_h$ and $T_h^β-Q_h^β$ where $π_h$ is the $H_0$ orthogonal projection into the finite element space. We note that the evaluation of $Q_h^β$ involves application of $(I+(t_i)^2L_h)^{-1}$ with $t_i$ being either a quadrature point or its inverse. Efficient solution algorithms for these problems are available and the problems at different quadrature points can be straightforwardly solved in parallel. Numerical experiments illustrating the theoretical estimates are provided for both the quadrature error $T_h^β-Q_h^β$ and the finite element error $T^β-T_h^βπ_h$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1307.0888

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No DOI on record — the citation lists can’t be looked up.

References 19 · Cited by 215

Metadata

Authors
Bonito, A., & Pasciak, J. E.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
Volume
84
Issue
295
Pages
2083-2110
ISSN
0025-5718 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075532512
Cited by
215
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5
FWCI
15.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mathematics of Computation (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1254618, KUS-C1-016-04, 1216551)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KUS-C1- 016-04)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Fractional Differential Equations Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
Keywords
fractional powers of operators, elliptic operators, unbounded operators, finite element approximation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review