A Deep and Tractable Density Estimator
Open accessAbstract
The Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimator (NADE) and its real-valued version RNADE are competitive density models of multidimensional data across a variety of domains. These models use a fixed, arbitrary ordering of the data dimensions. One can easily condition on variables at the beginning of the ordering, and marginalize out variables at the end of the ordering, however other inference tasks require approximate inference. In this work we introduce an efficient procedure to simultaneously train a NADE model for each possible ordering of the variables, by sharing parameters across all these models. We can thus use the most convenient model for each inference task at hand, and ensembles of such models with different orderings are immediately available. Moreover, unlike the original NADE, our training procedure scales to deep models. Empirically, ensembles of Deep NADE models obtain state of the art density estimation performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AlphaFold and RoseTTAfold produce remarkably good structure predictions for native proteins given multiple sequence alignments, but generally produce much poorer structures when provided only with a single sequence.
“AlphaFold (9) and RoseTTAfold (13) produce remarkably good structure predictions for native proteins given multiple sequence alignments which can contain substantial co-evolutionary and other information reflecting aspects of the 3D structure, but generally produce much poorer structures when provided only with a single sequence.”
From Robust deep learning–based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 100
- Authors
- Uria, B., Murray, I., & Larochelle, H.
- Affiliations
- Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
- ORCID
- Murray, Iain
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- 467-475
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1310.1757
- OpenAlex
- W2170111110
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- International Conference on Machine Learning
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Keywords
- natural deep eutectic solvents, density estimation, variable ordering, parameter sharing, ensemble learning, approximate inference, deep neural network, tractable inference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review