PreprintCited by 100Neural Networks and ApplicationsGaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

A Deep and Tractable Density Estimator

Open access
Uria, Benigno, Murray, Iain, Larochelle, Hugo·2013·arXiv

Abstract

The Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimator (NADE) and its real-valued version RNADE are competitive density models of multidimensional data across a variety of domains. These models use a fixed, arbitrary ordering of the data dimensions. One can easily condition on variables at the beginning of the ordering, and marginalize out variables at the end of the ordering, however other inference tasks require approximate inference. In this work we introduce an efficient procedure to simultaneously train a NADE model for each possible ordering of the variables, by sharing parameters across all these models. We can thus use the most convenient model for each inference task at hand, and ensembles of such models with different orderings are immediately available. Moreover, unlike the original NADE, our training procedure scales to deep models. Empirically, ensembles of Deep NADE models obtain state of the art density estimation performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1310.1757

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AlphaFold and RoseTTAfold produce remarkably good structure predictions for native proteins given multiple sequence alignments, but generally produce much poorer structures when provided only with a single sequence.

    “AlphaFold (9) and RoseTTAfold (13) produce remarkably good structure predictions for native proteins given multiple sequence alignments which can contain substantial co-evolutionary and other information reflecting aspects of the 3D structure, but generally produce much poorer structures when provided only with a single sequence.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 100

Authors
Uria, B., Murray, I., & Larochelle, H.
Affiliations
Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
Pages
467-475
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170111110
Cited by
100
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Conference on Machine Learning
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
natural deep eutectic solvents, density estimation, variable ordering, parameter sharing, ensemble learning, approximate inference, deep neural network, tractable inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review