Non-Markovian effect on remote state preparation
Open accessAbstract
Memory effect of non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems is often believed to be beneficial for quantum information processing. In this work, we employ an experimentally controllable two-photon open system, with one photon experiencing a dephasing environment and the other being free from noise, to show that non-Markovian effect may also have a negative impact on quantum tasks such as remote state preparation: For a certain period of controlled time interval, stronger non-Markovian effect yields lower fidelity of remote state preparation, as opposed to the common wisdom that more information leads to better performance. As a comparison, a positive non-Markovian effect on the RSP fidelity with another typical non-Markovian noise is analyzed. Consequently, the observed dual character of non-Markovian effect will be of great importance in the field of open systems engineering.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For the pure dephasing model, the maximum of both capacity measures is reached for the maximally mixed state, with a maximally entangled purification.
“It can be shown [118,209] that the maximum for both measures C ea and Q is reached for a maximally mixed state, ρ = I 2 /2, and then the required purification has to be a maximally entangled state”
From Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection (2014) · cites this paper as [118]
Section III (p. 3) says remote state preparation initially uses a maximally entangled shared state, but it does not connect that state to maximizing either capacity measure. Section IV (p. 4) discusses mutual information as a non-Markovianity measure. Searches for capacity, maximally mixed inputs, and purification found no passage establishing the claimed maxima. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [25]M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection
Rivas, Á., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/094001 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xu, Z.-Y., Liu, C., Luo, S., & Zhu, S.
- Affiliations
- Soochow University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Luo, Shunlong
- Zhu, Shiqun
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 356
- Pages
- 29-36
- ISSN
- 0003-4916 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1310.1784
- OpenAlex
- W2092507286
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annals of Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11074184, 11204196)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- non-Markovian dynamics, remote state preparation, open quantum systems, memory effects, dephasing noise, non-Markovian noise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
