On nonlocality as a resource theory and nonlocality measures
Open accessAbstract
With the advent of device independent quantum information processing, nonlocality is nowadays regarded as a resource to implement various tasks. On the analogy of entanglement theory we approach nonlocality from this perspective. In order to do so, we analyze in full detail the operations that can be implemented in this scenario and under which nonlocality cannot increase. This provides a theoretical ground to study how to order and quantify nonlocal behaviours. Finally, we review several nonlocality measures and discuss their validity from this point of view.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Links have already been reported between non-Markovianity and criticality/phase transitions, the Loschmidt echo, symmetry breaking, and Zeno/anti-Zeno effects.
“For instance, some quantitative relations between non-Markovianity effects and criticality and phase transitions [175, 256-258], Loschmidt echo [174, 175, 256], symmetry breaking [166], and Zeno and anti-Zeno effects [150] have already been described.”
From Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection (2014) · cites this paper as [256]
The Introduction (p. 2) and Conclusions (pp. 18–19) discuss nonlocality as a resource theory and its measures, not non-Markovianity. Searches for the claimed links and for “Loschmidt echo” found no passage in our copy addressing criticality, symmetry breaking, or Zeno/anti-Zeno effects. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- [2][2] Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2000 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press) -
- [5][5] Veitch V, Mousavian S A H, Gottesman D and Emerson J 2013 Preprint arXiv:1307.7171 - · arXiv
- [6][6] Masanes Ll, Pironio S and Ac´ ın A 2011 Nature Comm. 2 238 H¨ anggi E and Renner R 2010 Preprint arXiv:1009.1833 Pironio S, Masanes Ll, Leverrier A and Ac´ ın A 2013 Phys. Rev. X 3 031007 Vazirani U and Vidick T 2012 Preprint arXiv:1210.1810 - · arXiv
- [17][17] Brunner N, Cavalcanti D, Pironio P, Scarani V and Wehner S 2013 Preprint arXiv:1303.2849 - · arXiv
- [21][21] Tsirelson B S 1993 Hadronic Journal Supplement 8 329 -
- [41][41] van Dam W, Grunwald P and Gill R 2005 IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 51 2812 -
- [44][44] Cover T M and Thomas J A 2000 Elements of Information Theory (Wiley Interscience) -
- [46][46] Geller J and Piani M 2014 Preprint arXiv:1401.8197 · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection
Rivas, Á., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/094001 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Vicente, J. I.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 424017-424017
- ISSN
- 1751-8113 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1401.6941
- OpenAlex
- W2081341736
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- quantum nonlocality, resource theory, Bell nonlocality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
