The DOI matches its DataCite record.
From Predictive to Prescriptive Analytics
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we combine ideas from machine learning (ML) and operations research and management science (OR/MS) in developing a framework, along with specific methods, for using data to prescribe optimal decisions in OR/MS problems. In a departure from other work on data-driven optimization and reflecting our practical experience with the data available in applications of OR/MS, we consider data consisting, not only of observations of quantities with direct effect on costs/revenues, such as demand or returns, but predominantly of observations of associated auxiliary quantities. The main problem of interest is a conditional stochastic optimization problem, given imperfect observations, where the joint probability distributions that specify the problem are unknown. We demonstrate that our proposed solution methods, which are inspired by ML methods such as local regression, CART, and random forests, are generally applicable to a wide range of decision problems. We prove that they are tractable and asymptotically optimal even when data is not iid and may be censored. We extend this to the case where decision variables may directly affect uncertainty in unknown ways, such as pricing's effect on demand. As an analogue to R^2, we develop a metric P termed the coefficient of prescriptiveness to measure the prescriptive content of data and the efficacy of a policy from an operations perspective. To demonstrate the power of our approach in a real-world setting we study an inventory management problem faced by the distribution arm of an international media conglomerate, which ships an average of 1bil units per year. We leverage internal data and public online data harvested from IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes, and Google to prescribe operational decisions that outperform baseline measures. Specifically, the data we collect, leveraged by our methods, accounts for an 88\% improvement as measured by our P.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stochastic optimization focuses on decision making under uncertainty.
“In this sense, it focuses on decision making under uncertainty (Bertsimas & Kallus, 2014;Kawas et al., 2013).”
From Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges (2020) · cites this paper as Bertsimas & Kallus, 2014
It is not clear how to go from a good prediction to a good decision, since prescriptive analytics algorithms incorporate additional uncertainty sources.
“it is not clear how to go from a good prediction to a good decision (Bertsimas & Kallus, 2014), since prescriptive analytics algorithms incorporate additional uncertainty sources in information processing.”
From Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges (2020) · cites this paper as Bertsimas & Kallus, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Arya, Sunil, David Mount, Nathan Netanyahu, Ruth Silverman, Angela Wu. 1998. An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching in fixed dimensions. J. ACM 45(6) 891-923.
- Belloni, Alexandre, Victor Chernozhukov. 2011. `1-penalized quantile regression in high-dimensional sparse models. The Annals of Statistics 39(1) 82-130.
- Ben-Tal, Aharon, Laurent El Ghaoui, Arkadi Nemirovski. 2009. Robust optimization. Princeton University Press.
- Bentley, Jon. 1975. Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching. Commun. ACM 18(9) 509-517.
- Berger, James O. 1985. Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. Springer.
- Bertsimas, Dimitris, David B Brown, Constantine Caramanis. 2011. Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM review 53(3) 464-501.
- Billingsley, P. 1999. Convergence of Probability Measures. Wiley, New York.
- Birge, John R, Francois Louveaux. 2011. Introduction to stochastic programming. Springer.
- Blondel, Vincent D, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, Etienne Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008(10)
- Breiman, Leo, Jerome Friedman, Charles Stone, Richard Olshen. 1984. Classification and regression trees. CRC press.
- Calafiore, Giuseppe Carlo, Laurent El Ghaoui. 2006. On distributionally robust chance-constrained linear programs. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 130(1) 1-22.
- Cameron, A Colin, Pravin K Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge university press.
- Choi, Hyunyoung, Hal Varian. 2012. Predicting the present with google trends. Econ. Rec. 88(s1) 2-9. From Predictive to Prescriptive Analytics Cleveland, William S, Susan J Devlin. 1988. Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83(403) 596-610.
- Doukhan, Paul. 1994. Mixing: Properties and Examples. Springer.
- Dudley, Richard M. 2002. Real analysis and probability, vol. 74. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Fan, Jianqing. 1993. Local linear regression smoothers and their minimax e ciencies. The Annals of Statistics 196-216.
- Geer, Sara A. 2000. Empirical Processes in M-estimation, vol. 6. Cambridge university press.
- Grotschel, M, L Lovasz, A Schrijver. 1993. Geometric algorithms and combinatorial optimization. Springer, New York.
- Gruhl, Daniel, Ramanathan Guha, Ravi Kumar, Jasmine Novak, Andrew Tomkins. 2005. The predictive power of online chatter. SIGKDD. 78-87.
- Hanasusanto, Grani Adiwena, Daniel Kuhn. 2013. Robust data-driven dynamic programming. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 827-835.
- Hannah, Lauren, Warren Powell, David M Blei. 2010. Nonparametric density estimation for stochastic optimization with an observable state variable. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 820-828.
- Imbens, Guido W, Donald B Rubin. 2015. Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge University Press.
- Kakade, Sham, Karthik Sridharan, Ambuj Tewari. 2008. On the complexity of linear prediction: Risk bounds, margin bounds, and regularization. NIPS . 793-800.
- Kao, Yi-hao, Benjamin V Roy, Xiang Yan. 2009. Directed regression. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 889-897.
- Kaplan, Edward L, Paul Meier. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American statistical association 53(282) 457-481.
- Koenker, Roger. 2005. Quantile regression. 38, Cambridge university press.
- Ledoux, Michel, Michel Talagrand. 1991. Probability in Banach Spaces: isoperimetry and processes. Springer.
- Lehmann, Erich Leo, George Casella. 1998. Theory of point estimation, vol. 31. Springer.
- Mcdonald, Daniel, Cosma Shalizi, Mark Schervish. 2011. Estimating beta-mixing coe cients. AISTATS . 516-524.
- Mohri, Mehryar, Afshin Rostamizadeh. 2008. Rademacher complexity bounds for non-iid processes. NIPS . 1097-1104.
- Mohri, Mehryar, Afshin Rostamizadeh, Ameet Talwalkar. 2012. Foundations of machine learning. MIT press.
- Nemirovski, Arkadi, Anatoli Juditsky, Guanghui Lan, Alexander Shapiro. 2009. Robust stochastic approxi- mation approach to stochastic programming. SIAM Journal on Optimization 19(4) 1574-1609.
- Parzen, Emanuel. 1962. On estimation of a probability density function and mode. The annals of mathe- matical statistics 1065-1076.
- Robbins, Herbert. 1952. Some aspects of the sequential design of experiments. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 58 527-535.
- Robbins, Herbert, Sutton Monro. 1951. A stochastic approximation method. The annals of mathematical statistics 400-407.
- Shapiro, Alexander, Arkadi Nemirovski. 2005. On complexity of stochastic programming problems. Contin- uous optimization. Springer, 111-146.
- Tibshirani, Robert. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 267-288.
- Trevor, Hastie, Tibshirani Robert, Jerome Friedman. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning, vol. 1. Springer.
- Vapnik, Vladimir. 1992. Principles of risk minimization for learning theory. Advances in neural information processing systems. 831-838.
- Wald, Abraham. 1949. Statistical decision functions. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 165-205.
- Walk, Harro. 2010. Strong laws of large numbers and nonparametric estimation. Recent Developments in Applied Probability and Statistics. Springer, 183-214.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges
Lepenioti, K., Bousdekis, A., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.003 · Cited by 501
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertsimas, D., & Kallus, N.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kallus, Nathan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1025-1044
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1402.5481
- OpenAlex
- W1507350577
- Cited by
- 783
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 190 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 75.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1122374)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Risk and Portfolio Optimization
- Keywords
- prescriptive analytics, data-driven optimization, imperfect observation, inventory management, media distribution, censored observations, non-IID data, asymptotic optimality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review