PreprintCited by 8Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

De Sitter Space Without Dynamical Quantum Fluctuations

Open access
Boddy, Kimberly K., Carroll, Sean M., Pollack, Jason·2014·arXiv

Abstract

We argue that, under certain plausible assumptions, de Sitter space settles into a quiescent vacuum in which there are no dynamical quantum fluctuations. Such fluctuations require either an evolving microstate, or time-dependent histories of out-of-equilibrium recording devices, which we argue are absent in stationary states. For a massive scalar field in a fixed de Sitter background, the cosmic no-hair theorem implies that the state of the patch approaches the vacuum, where there are no fluctuations. We argue that an analogous conclusion holds whenever a patch of de Sitter is embedded in a larger theory with an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, including semiclassical quantum gravity with false vacua or complementarity in theories with at least one Minkowski vacuum. This reasoning provides an escape from the Boltzmann brain problem in such theories. It also implies that vacuum states do not uptunnel to higher-energy vacua and that perturbations do not decohere while slow-roll inflation occurs, suggesting that eternal inflation is much less common than often supposed. On the other hand, if a de Sitter patch is a closed system with a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, there will be Poincare recurrences and dynamical Boltzmann fluctuations into lower-entropy states. Our analysis does not alter the conventional understanding of the origin of density fluctuations from primordial inflation, since reheating naturally generates a high-entropy environment and leads to decoherence, nor does it affect the existence of non-dynamical vacuum fluctuations such as those that give rise to the Casimir effect.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1405.0298

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum fluctuations in de Sitter space do not actually bring into existence decohered branches of the wave function containing freak observers.

    “As argued in [27], however, quantum fluctuations in de Sitter space don't actually bring into existence decohered branches of the wave function containing such freak observers.”

    From In What Sense Is the Early Universe Fine-Tuned? (2014) · cites this paper as [27]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 8

Authors
Boddy, K. K., Carroll, S. M., & Pollack, J.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950589815
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
de Sitter space, cosmic no-hair theorem, massive scalar field, quantum gravity, complementarity, Poincaré recurrence, decoherence, slow-roll inflation, eternal inflation, vacuum decay, Casimir effect, reheating, primordial density fluctuations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review