PreprintCited by 61Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.

How Many $e$-Folds Should We Expect from High-Scale Inflation?

Open access

Abstract

We address the issue of how many $e$-folds we would naturally expect if inflation occurred at an energy scale of order $10^{16}$ GeV. We use the canonical measure on trajectories in classical phase space, specialized to the case of flat universes with a single scalar field. While there is no exact analytic expression for the measure, we are able to derive conditions that determine its behavior. For a quadratic potential $V(ϕ)=m^{2}ϕ^{2}/2$ with $m=2\times10^{13}$ GeV and cutoff at $M_{\rm Pl}=2.4\times10^{18}$ GeV, we find an expectation value of $2\times10^{10}$ $e$-folds on the set of Friedmann-Robertson-Walker trajectories. For cosine inflation $V(ϕ)=Λ^{4}[1-\cos(ϕ/f)]$ with $f=1.5\times10^{19}$ GeV, we find that the expected total number of $e$-folds is 50, which would just satisfy the observed requirements of our own Universe; if $f$ is larger, more than 50 $e$-folds are generically attained. We conclude that one should expect a large amount of inflation in large-field models and more limited inflation in small-field (hilltop) scenarios.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1405.5538

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The problem of obtaining a measure on flat universes was later solved in [68], which derived a measure on the phase space for flat universes by demanding Liouville's theorem, and [69], which used this to derive a measure on the space of trajectories.

    “This problem was later solved in [68], which derived a measure on the phase space for flat universes by demanding that it obey Liouville's theorem, and [69], which used this to derive a measure on the space of trajectories.”

    From In What Sense Is the Early Universe Fine-Tuned? (2014) · cites this paper as [69]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 14 · Cited by 61

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [13]J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, and M. Sueiro, JCAP 1402 , 044 (2014), arXiv:1312.1353 [astro-ph.CO]. · arXiv
  2. [14]F. Marchesano, G. Shiu, and A. M. Uranga (2014), arXiv:1404.3040 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  3. [15]F. C. Adams, J. R. Bond, K. Freese, J. A. Frieman, and A. V. Olinto, Phys.Rev. D47 , 426 (1993), arXiv:hep-ph/9207245 [hep-ph]. · arXiv
  4. [17]N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, P. Creminelli, and L. Randall, Phys.Rev.Lett. 90 , 221302 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0301218 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  5. [18]C. Germani and A. Kehagias, Phys.Rev.Lett. 106 , 161302 (2011), arXiv:1012.0853 [hep-ph]. · arXiv
  6. [19]R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and B. Vercnocke (2014), arXiv:1404.6244 [hep-th]. · arXiv

Metadata

Authors
Remmen, G. N., & Carroll, S. M.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
Volume
90
Issue
6
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966537924
Cited by
61
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
lv
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1144469)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0011632)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • Hertz Foundation
  • California Institute of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
inflation (cosmology), number of e-folds, high-scale inflation, large-field inflation, hilltop inflation, canonical measure, quadratic potential, cosine potential, flat universe, scalar field

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review