CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 27Particle physics theoretical and experimental studiesQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsAdvanced Mathematical Theories and Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Removing the gauge parameter dependence of the effective potential by a field redefinition

Open access
Nielsen, N. K.·2014·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1406.0788arXiv 1406.0788
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The gauge parameter dependence of the effective potential is determined by partial differential equations involving also the Higgs boson field expectation value. Solving these equations by the method of characteristics leads to complete elimination of the gauge parameter dependence of the effective potential. The construction is carried out in the case of the standard model of electroweak unification for the renormalization group improved effective potential up to the next-leading logarithmic order.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1406.0788

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nielsen proved that the gauge dependence of the effective potential can be reabsorbed by a re-definition of the fields.

    “Nielsen[35] proved that the gauge dependence of the effective potential can be reabsorbed by a re-definition of the fields.”

    From The cosmological Higgstory of the vacuum instability (2015) · cites this paper as [35]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [1][1] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Phys.Lett.B 716 (2012) 1; arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]. - · arXiv
  2. [2][2] CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Phys.Lett.B 716 (2012) 30; arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]. - · arXiv
  3. [4][4] M. Sher, Phys.Rept. 179 (1989) 273; M. Lindner, M. Sher and H. W. Zaglauer, Phys.Lett. B228 (1989) 139; P. B. Arnold, Phys.Rev. D40 (1989) 613; M. Sher, Phys.Lett. B317 (1993) 159, arXiv:hep-ph/9307342; J.A. Casas, J.R. Espinosa and M. Quir´ os, Phys. Lett. B342 (1995) 171, arXiv:hep-ph/9409458; ibid. B382 (1996) 374, arXiv:hep-ph/9603227; Nucl. Phys. B436 (1995) 3, arXiv:hep-ph/9604241. - · arXiv
  4. [5][5] M. Holthausen, K. S. Lim, and M. Lindner, JHEP 1202 (2012) 037, arXiv:1112.2415 [hep-ph]; J. Elias-Mir´ o, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, A. Riotto and A. Strumia, Phys.Lett. B709 (2012) 222, arXiv:1112.3022 [hep-ph]; F. Bezrukov, M. Y. Kalmykov, B. A. Kniehl and M. Shaposhnikov, JHEP 1210 (2012) 140, arXiv:1205.2893 [hep-ph]; G. Degrassi, S. Di Vita, J. Elias-Mir´ o, J.R.Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, JHEP 1208 [2012] 098, arXiv:1205.6497 [hep-ph]; S. Alekhin, A. Djouadi, and S. Moch, Phys.Lett. B716 (2012) 214, arXiv:1207.0980 [hepph]; I. Masina, Phys.Rev. D87 (2013) 053001, arXiv:1209.0393 [hep-ph]; O. Antipin, M. Gillioz, J. Krog, E. Mølgaard and F. Sannino, JHEP 1308 (2013) 034, arXiv:1306.3234; D. Buttazzo, G. Degrassi, P.P. Giardino, G.F.Giudice, F. Sala, A. Salvio and A. Strumia, JHEP 1312 [2013] 089, arXiv 1307.3536 [hep-ph]; V. Branchina and E. Messina, Phys.Rev.Lett. 111 (2013) 241801, arXiv:1307.5193 [hep-ph]. - · arXiv
  5. [6][6] W. Loinaz and R. S. Willey, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 7416, arXiv:hep-ph/9702321. - · arXiv
  6. [7][7] A. J. Andreassen, Master's thesis, NTNU-Trondheim (2013). -
  7. [8][8] J.L. Cook, L.M. Krauss, A.J.Long and S. Sabharwal, Phys.Rev. D89 (2014) 103525, arXiv:1403.4971 [astro-ph]. - · arXiv
  8. [9][9] L. Di Luzio and L. Mihaila, JHEP 1406 (2014) 079, arXiv:1404.7450 [hep-ph]. - · arXiv
  9. [13][13] W. Fischler and R. Brout, Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 905; J.-M. Fr` ere and P. Nicoletopoulos, Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 2332; H. Kluberg-Stern and J.B. Zuber, Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975) 467; ibid. D 12 (1975) 482; W. Konetschny and W. Kummer, Nucl. Phys. B 100 (1975) 106; O. Piguet and K. Sibold, Nucl. Phys. B 253 (1985) 517; O.M. Del Cima, Phys.Lett.B457 (1999) 307, arXiv:hep-th 9903004; A. Lewandowski, arXiv:1307.4055 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  10. [14][14] P.M.Lavrov and I.V.Tyutin, Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 34 (1981) 156, ibid. 34 (1981) 474; O.M. Del Cima, D.H.T. Franco and O. Piguet, Nucl. Phys. B551 (1999) 813, arXiv:hep-th/9902084. - · arXiv
  11. [15][15] D.Boyanovski, W.Loinaz and R.S.Willey, Phys.Rev.D57 (1998) 100, arXiv:hep-th/9705340. - · arXiv
  12. [16][16] G.-L.Lin and T.-K. Chyi, Phys.Rev.D60 (1999) 016002, arXiv:hep-ph/9811213. - · arXiv
  13. [18][18] J. Zinn-Justin, in Trends in Elementary Particle Theory, International Summer Institute on Theoretical Physics in Bonn 1974, Lecture notes in physics vol. 37, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1975). -
  14. [19][19] C. Ford, D.R.T. Jones, P.W. Stephenson and M. Einhorn, Nucl. Phys. B395 (1993) 17, arXiv:hep-lat/9210033. - · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nielsen, N. K.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Nielsen, N. K.
ORCID
Nielsen, N. K.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
Volume
90
Issue
3
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1406.0788
arXiv
1406.0788
OpenAlex
W2162240401
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
Keywords
effective potential, gauge dependence, field redefinitions, method of characteristics, electroweak unification, Standard Model, renormalization group, electroweak corrections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review