Deep Unfolding: Model-Based Inspiration of Novel Deep Architectures
Open accessAbstract
Model-based methods and deep neural networks have both been tremendously successful paradigms in machine learning. In model-based methods, problem domain knowledge can be built into the constraints of the model, typically at the expense of difficulties during inference. In contrast, deterministic deep neural networks are constructed in such a way that inference is straightforward, but their architectures are generic and it is unclear how to incorporate knowledge. This work aims to obtain the advantages of both approaches. To do so, we start with a model-based approach and an associated inference algorithm, and \emph{unfold} the inference iterations as layers in a deep network. Rather than optimizing the original model, we \emph{untie} the model parameters across layers, in order to create a more powerful network. The resulting architecture can be trained discriminatively to perform accurate inference within a fixed network size. We show how this framework allows us to interpret conventional networks as mean-field inference in Markov random fields, and to obtain new architectures by instead using belief propagation as the inference algorithm. We then show its application to a non-negative matrix factorization model that incorporates the problem-domain knowledge that sound sources are additive. Deep unfolding of this model yields a new kind of non-negative deep neural network, that can be trained using a multiplicative backpropagation-style update algorithm. We present speech enhancement experiments showing that our approach is competitive with conventional neural networks despite using far fewer parameters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A detector design by unfolding iterative calculations into ANN layers for MIMO decode and forward relay channels has been proposed.
“A detector design by unfolding iterative calculations into ANN layers for MIMO decode and forward relay channels has been proposed in [106].”
From Quantum Machine Learning for 6G Communication Networks: State-of-the-Art and Vision for the Future (2019) · cites this paper as [106]
A very interesting approach in this context is deep unfolding of existing iterative algorithms.
“A very interesting approach in this context is deep unfolding of existing iterative algorithms outlined in [25].”
From An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layer (2017) · cites this paper as [25]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 412
- Authors
- Hershey, J. R., Roux, J. L., & Weninger, F.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institute (US)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- ORCID
- Roux, Jonathan Le
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2014
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1409.2574
- OpenAlex
- W1831449718
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- deep unfolding, model-based deep learning, mean-field inference, Markov random fields, belief propagation, non-negative matrix factorization, speech enhancement, sound source separation, domain knowledge integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review