PreprintCited by 412Neural Networks and ApplicationsSpeech and Audio ProcessingSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

Deep Unfolding: Model-Based Inspiration of Novel Deep Architectures

Open access
Hershey, John R., Roux, Jonathan Le, Weninger, Felix·2014·arXiv

Abstract

Model-based methods and deep neural networks have both been tremendously successful paradigms in machine learning. In model-based methods, problem domain knowledge can be built into the constraints of the model, typically at the expense of difficulties during inference. In contrast, deterministic deep neural networks are constructed in such a way that inference is straightforward, but their architectures are generic and it is unclear how to incorporate knowledge. This work aims to obtain the advantages of both approaches. To do so, we start with a model-based approach and an associated inference algorithm, and \emph{unfold} the inference iterations as layers in a deep network. Rather than optimizing the original model, we \emph{untie} the model parameters across layers, in order to create a more powerful network. The resulting architecture can be trained discriminatively to perform accurate inference within a fixed network size. We show how this framework allows us to interpret conventional networks as mean-field inference in Markov random fields, and to obtain new architectures by instead using belief propagation as the inference algorithm. We then show its application to a non-negative matrix factorization model that incorporates the problem-domain knowledge that sound sources are additive. Deep unfolding of this model yields a new kind of non-negative deep neural network, that can be trained using a multiplicative backpropagation-style update algorithm. We present speech enhancement experiments showing that our approach is competitive with conventional neural networks despite using far fewer parameters.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1409.2574

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A detector design by unfolding iterative calculations into ANN layers for MIMO decode and forward relay channels has been proposed.

    “A detector design by unfolding iterative calculations into ANN layers for MIMO decode and forward relay channels has been proposed in [106].”
  • A very interesting approach in this context is deep unfolding of existing iterative algorithms.

    “A very interesting approach in this context is deep unfolding of existing iterative algorithms outlined in [25].”

    From An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layer (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 412

Authors
Hershey, J. R., Roux, J. L., & Weninger, F.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institute (US)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1831449718
Cited by
412
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
deep unfolding, model-based deep learning, mean-field inference, Markov random fields, belief propagation, non-negative matrix factorization, speech enhancement, sound source separation, domain knowledge integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review