PreprintCited by 7Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do More Dropouts in Pool5 Feature Maps for Better Object Detection

Open access

Abstract

Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have gained great success in image classification and object detection. In these fields, the outputs of all layers of CNNs are usually considered as a high dimensional feature vector extracted from an input image and the correspondence between finer level feature vectors and concepts that the input image contains is all-important. However, fewer studies focus on this deserving issue. On considering the correspondence, we propose a novel approach which generates an edited version for each original CNN feature vector by applying the maximum entropy principle to abandon particular vectors. These selected vectors correspond to the unfriendly concepts in each image category. The classifier trained from merged feature sets can significantly improve model generalization of individual categories when training data is limited. The experimental results for classification-based object detection on canonical datasets including VOC 2007 (60.1%), 2010 (56.4%) and 2012 (56.3%) show obvious improvement in mean average precision (mAP) with simple linear support vector machines.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1409.6911

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Picasso Dataset and People-Art Dataset are for testing person detection on artwork.

    “We compare YOLO to other detection systems on the Picasso Dataset [12] and the People-Art Dataset [3], two datasets for testing person detection on artwork.”

    From You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection (2016) · cites this paper as [3]

  • In real-world applications, test data can diverge from what the system has seen before.

    “In real-world applications it is hard to predict all possible use cases and the test data can diverge from what the system has seen before [3].”

    From You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection (2016) · cites this paper as [3]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shen, Z., & Xue, X.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W48707324
Cited by
7
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
feature selection, maximum entropy principle, object detection, feature matching, limited training data, model generalization, support vector machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review