The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Universe in a black hole in Einstein$-$Cartan gravity
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/96 · Paper page
Abstract
The conservation law for the angular momentum in curved spacetime, consistent with relativistic quantum mechanics, requires that the antisymmetric part of the affine connection (torsion tensor) is a variable in the principle of least action. The coupling between the spin of elementary particles and torsion in the Einstein$-$Cartan theory of gravity generates gravitational repulsion at extremely high densities in fermionic matter, approximated as a spin fluid, and thus avoids the formation of singularities in black holes. The collapsing matter in a black hole should therefore bounce at a finite density and then expand into a new region of space on the other side of the event horizon, which may be regarded as a nonsingular, closed universe. We show that quantum particle production caused by an extremely high curvature near a bounce can create enormous amounts of matter, produce entropy, and generate a finite period of exponential expansion (inflation) of this universe. This scenario can thus explain inflation without a scalar field and reheating. We show that, depending on the particle production rate, such a universe may undergo several nonsingular bounces until it has enough matter to reach a size at which the cosmological constant starts cosmic acceleration. The last bounce can be regarded as the big bang of this universe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Popławski, N.
- Affiliations
- University of New Haven (US)
- Corresponding author
- Popławski, Nikodem
- ORCID
- Popławski, Nikodem
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 832
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-96
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1410.3881
- OpenAlex
- W1794764097
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- Einstein-Cartan theory, torsion, black hole singularity resolution, non-singular bounce, spin fluid, fermionic matter, angular momentum conservation, primordial inflation, Big Bang, closed universe, cosmic acceleration, cosmological constant, entropy production
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review