Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets
Open accessAbstract
Generative Adversarial Nets [8] were recently introduced as a novel way to train generative models. In this work we introduce the conditional version of generative adversarial nets, which can be constructed by simply feeding the data, y, we wish to condition on to both the generator and discriminator. We show that this model can generate MNIST digits conditioned on class labels. We also illustrate how this model could be used to learn a multi-modal model, and provide preliminary examples of an application to image tagging in which we demonstrate how this approach can generate descriptive tags which are not part of training labels.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Representational convergence could explain why conditional generation is easier than unconditional generation.
“Our hypothesis could explain the phenomenon that conditional generation is easier than unconditional (Mirza & Osindero, 2014;Liu et al., 2020;Sauer et al., 2022), as the data we condition on may have the same platonic structure as the data we are generating.”
From The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (2024) · cites this paper as Mirza & Osindero, 2014
The Introduction (p. 1) says conditioning lets a model direct generation, whereas an unconditioned model cannot control which modes it generates. It does not establish that conditional generation is generally easier; the Unimodal results (p. 4) say the conditional model was outperformed by a non-conditional one. The representational-convergence explanation is the citing authors’ own hypothesis, not a claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDiffusion models are in principle capable of modeling conditional distributions of the form p(z|y).
“Similar to other types of generative models [56, 83], diffusion models are in principle capable of modeling conditional distributions of the form p(z|y).”
From High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models (2022) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 15 · Cited by 8,863
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- [1][1] Bengio, Y., Mesnil, G., Dauphin, Y., and Rifai, S. (2013). Better mixing via deep representations. In ICML'2013 . -
- [2][2] Bengio, Y., Thibodeau-Laufer, E., Alain, G., and Yosinski, J. (2014). Deep generative stochastic networks trainable by backprop. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'14) . -
- [3][3] Frome, A., Corrado, G. S., Shlens, J., Bengio, S., Dean, J., Mikolov, T., et al. (2013). Devise: A deep visual-semantic embedding model. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 21212129. -
- [4][4] Glorot, X., Bordes, A., and Bengio, Y. (2011). Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 315-323. -
- [5][5] Goodfellow, I., Mirza, M., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2013a). Multi-prediction deep boltzmann machines. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 548-556. -
- [6][6] Goodfellow, I. J., Warde-Farley, D., Mirza, M., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2013b). Maxout networks. In ICML'2013 . -
- [7][7] Goodfellow, I. J., Warde-Farley, D., Lamblin, P., Dumoulin, V., Mirza, M., Pascanu, R., Bergstra, J., Bastien, F., and Bengio, Y. (2013c). Pylearn2: a machine learning research library. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.4214 . - · arXiv
- [8][8] Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. In NIPS'2014 . -
- [9][9] Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Salakhutdinov, R. (2012). Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. Technical report, arXiv:1207.0580. - · arXiv
- [10][10] Huiskes, M. J. and Lew, M. S. (2008). The mir flickr retrieval evaluation. In MIR '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval , New York, NY, USA. ACM. -
- [12][12] Kiros, R., Zemel, R., and Salakhutdinov, R. (2013). Multimodal neural language models. In Proc. NIPS Deep Learning Workshop . -
- [13][13] Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. (2012). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 (NIPS'2012) . -
- [15][15] Russakovsky, O. and Fei-Fei, L. (2010). Attribute learning in large-scale datasets. In European Conference of Computer Vision (ECCV), International Workshop on Parts and Attributes , Crete, Greece. -
- [16][16] Srivastava, N. and Salakhutdinov, R. (2012). Multimodal learning with deep boltzmann machines. In NIPS'2012 . -
- [17][17] Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A. (2014). Going deeper with convolutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.4842 . · arXiv
- Authors
- Mirza, M., & Osindero, S.
- ORCID
- Mirza, Mehdi
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2014
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1411.1784
- OpenAlex
- W2125389028
- Cited by
- 8,863
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 62 · 2025: 551 · 2024: 1056 · 2023: 1138 · 2022: 1104 · 2021: 1569 · 2020: 1410 · 2019: 1110 · 2018: 626 · 2017: 212 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- conditional generative adversarial networks, generative adversarial networks, conditional generation, multimodal models, image tagging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
