CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 69Image Retrieval and Classification TechniquesPhotography and Visual CultureAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

YFCC100M: The New Data in Multimedia Research

Open access
Thomee, Bart, Shamma, David A., Friedland, Gerald, Elizalde, Benjamin, Ni, Karl, Poland, Douglas, Borth, Damian, Li, Li-Jia·2015·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1503.01817arXiv 1503.01817
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We present the Yahoo Flickr Creative Commons 100 Million Dataset (YFCC100M), the largest public multimedia collection that has ever been released. The dataset contains a total of 100 million media objects, of which approximately 99.2 million are photos and 0.8 million are videos, all of which carry a Creative Commons license. Each media object in the dataset is represented by several pieces of metadata, e.g. Flickr identifier, owner name, camera, title, tags, geo, media source. The collection provides a comprehensive snapshot of how photos and videos were taken, described, and shared over the years, from the inception of Flickr in 2004 until early 2014. In this article we explain the rationale behind its creation, as well as the implications the dataset has for science, research, engineering, and development. We further present several new challenges in multimedia research that can now be expanded upon with our dataset.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1503.01817

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • KoNViD-1k consists of 1,200 public-domain videos sampled from the YFCC100M dataset, annotated by 642 crowd-workers.

    “It consists of 1,200 public-domain videos sampled from the YFCC100M dataset [15], and was annotated by 642 crowd-workers.”

    From UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 69

Authors
Thomee, B., Shamma, D. A., Friedland, G., Elizalde, B., Ni, K., Poland, D., Borth, D., & Li, L.-J.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1503.01817
arXiv
1503.01817
OpenAlex
W6928992657
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Photography and Visual Culture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
Flickr, Creative Commons, image metadata, geotagging, media sharing, open data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review