robumeta: An R-package for robust variance estimation in meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Meta-regression models are commonly used to synthesize and compare effect sizes. Unfortunately, traditional meta-regression methods are ill-equipped to handle the complex and often unknown correlations among non-independent effect sizes. Robust variance estimation (RVE) is a recently proposed meta-analytic method for dealing with dependent effect sizes. The robumeta package provides functions for performing robust variance meta-regression using both large and small sample RVE estimators under various weighting schemes. These methods are distribution free and provide valid point estimates, standard errors and hypothesis tests even when the degree and structure of dependence between effect sizes is unknown.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These symptoms may alter adolescents' social media interaction and its impact on their mental health.
“These symptoms may alter their social media interaction and its impact on their mental health.36,46,47”
From Social Media Use and Internalizing Symptoms in Clinical and Community Adolescent Samples: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
The Introduction (pp. 1–2) discusses methods for meta-analysis, and Example 2 (p. 11) uses a fictional alcohol-intervention dataset. Searches for adolescent symptoms, social media interaction, and mental health found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 280
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Ahn S, Ames AJ, Myers ND (2012). 'A Review of Meta-Analyses in Education Methodological Strengths and Weaknesses.' Review of Educational Research , 82 (4).
- Becker BJ (2000). 'Multivariate Meta-Analysis.' In HEA Tinsley, SD Brown (eds.), Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling , pp. 499-525. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, US.
- Bell RM, McCaffrey DF (2002). 'Bias Reduction in Standard Errors for Linear Regression with Multi-Stage Samples.' Survey Methodology , 28 (2), 169-181.
- Eicker F (1967). 'Limit Theorems for Regressions with Unequal and Dependent Errors.' In LM Le Cam, J Neyman (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability , volume 1, pp. 59-82. University of California Press, Berkeley.
- Gleser LJ, Olkin I (2009). 'Stochastically Dependent Effect Sizes.' In HM Cooper, LV Hedges, JC Valentine (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis , 2nd edition. Russell Sage Foundation.
- Hedges LV (1982). 'Fitting Continuous Models to Effect Size Data.' Journal of Educational Statistics , 7 (4), 245-270.
- Hedges LV, Olkin I (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis . Academic Press.
- Hedges LV, Tipton E, Johnson MC (2010). 'Robust Variance Estimation in Meta-Regression With Dependent Effect Size Estimates.' Research Synthesis Methods , 1 (1), 39-65.
- Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003). 'Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.' BMJ : British Medical Journal , 327 (7414), 557-560.
- Huber P (1967). 'The Behavior of the Maximum Likelihood Estimates Under Nonstandard Conditions.' In J Neyman Lucien Marie Le Cam (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability , pp. 221-233. University of California Press, Berkeley.
- Ishak KJ, Platt RW, Joseph L, Hanley JA (2008). 'Impact of approximating or ignoring within-study covariances in multivariate meta-analyses.' Statistics in Medicine , 27 (5), 670-686.
- Jackson D, Riley R, White IR (2011). 'Multivariate meta-analysis: Potential and promise.' Statistics in Medicine , 30 (20), 2481-2498.
- Kalaian HA, Raudenbush SW (1996). 'A Multivariate Mixed Linear Model for MetaAnalysis.' Psychological Methods , 1 (3), 227-235.
- Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986). 'Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized Linear Models.' Biometrika , 73 (1), 13-22.
- Matt GE, Cook TD (2009).'Threats to the Validity of Generalized Inferences.'In HM Cooper, LV Hedges, JC Valentine (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis , 2nd edition. Russell Sage Foundation.
- McCaffrey DF, Robert M Bell, Botts CH (2001). 'Generalizations of Biased Reduced Linearization.' In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association .
- Oswald FL, Mitchell G, Blanton H, Jaccard J, Tetlock PE (2013). 'Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: a meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies.' Journal of personality and social psychology , 105 (2), 171-192.
- Polanin JR (2013). 'Addressing the Issue of Meta-Analysis Multiplicity in Education and Psychology.' Doctoral Dissertation .
- Raudenbush SW, Becker BJ, Kalaian H (1988). 'Modeling Multivariate Effect Sizes.' Psychological Bulletin , 103 (1), 111-120.
- Tipton E (in press). 'Small Sample Adjustments for Robust Variance Estimation with MetaRegression.' Psychological Methods .
- Van den Noortgate W, L´ opez-L´ opez J, Mar´ ın-Mart´ ınez F, S´ anchez-Meca J (2013). 'ThreeLevel Meta-Analysis of Dependent Effect Sizes.' Behavior Research Methods , 45 (2), 576594.
- White H (1980). 'A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.' Econometrica , 48 (4), 817-38.
- Williams RT (2012). 'Using Robust Standard Errors to Combine Multiple Regression Estimates with Meta-Analysis.' Doctoral Dissertation .
- Authors
- Fisher, Z., & Tipton, E.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1503.02220
- OpenAlex
- W2125255169
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Analysis with R
- Keywords
- robust variance estimation, meta-regression, dependent effect sizes, weighting schemes, nonparametric inference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
