PreprintCited by 8Constraint Satisfaction and OptimizationComplexity and Algorithms in GraphsAdvanced Graph Theory Research

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Beating the random assignment on constraint satisfaction problems of bounded degree

Open access

Abstract

We show that for any odd $k$ and any instance of the Max-kXOR constraint satisfaction problem, there is an efficient algorithm that finds an assignment satisfying at least a $\frac{1}{2} + Ω(1/\sqrt{D})$ fraction of constraints, where $D$ is a bound on the number of constraints that each variable occurs in. This improves both qualitatively and quantitatively on the recent work of Farhi, Goldstone, and Gutmann (2014), which gave a \emph{quantum} algorithm to find an assignment satisfying a $\frac{1}{2} + Ω(D^{-3/4})$ fraction of the equations. For arbitrary constraint satisfaction problems, we give a similar result for "triangle-free" instances; i.e., an efficient algorithm that finds an assignment satisfying at least a $μ+ Ω(1/\sqrt{D})$ fraction of constraints, where $μ$ is the fraction that would be satisfied by a uniformly random assignment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1505.03424

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Farhi et al. work inspired a more efficient classical algorithm for the same problem.

    “This inspired a more ef fi cient classical algorithm for the same problem, 25”

    From Quantum algorithms: an overview (2016) · cites this paper as [25]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barak, B., Moitra, A., O'Donnell, R., Raghavendra, P., Regev, O., Steurer, D., Trevisan, L., Vijayaraghavan, A., Witmer, D., & Wright, J.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2595832812
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Graph Theory Research
Keywords
constraint satisfaction, bounded degree, random assignment, approximation algorithms, quantum algorithms, satisfiability, combinatorial optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review