PreprintCited by 2,103Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAdaptive Dynamic Programming ControlRobotic Locomotion and Control

High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimation

Open access
Schulman, John, Moritz, Philipp, Levine, Sergey, Jordan, Michael, Abbeel, Pieter·2015·arXiv

Abstract

Policy gradient methods are an appealing approach in reinforcement learning because they directly optimize the cumulative reward and can straightforwardly be used with nonlinear function approximators such as neural networks. The two main challenges are the large number of samples typically required, and the difficulty of obtaining stable and steady improvement despite the nonstationarity of the incoming data. We address the first challenge by using value functions to substantially reduce the variance of policy gradient estimates at the cost of some bias, with an exponentially-weighted estimator of the advantage function that is analogous to TD(lambda). We address the second challenge by using trust region optimization procedure for both the policy and the value function, which are represented by neural networks. Our approach yields strong empirical results on highly challenging 3D locomotion tasks, learning running gaits for bipedal and quadrupedal simulated robots, and learning a policy for getting the biped to stand up from starting out lying on the ground. In contrast to a body of prior work that uses hand-crafted policy representations, our neural network policies map directly from raw kinematics to joint torques. Our algorithm is fully model-free, and the amount of simulated experience required for the learning tasks on 3D bipeds corresponds to 1-2 weeks of real time.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1506.02438

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing research has employed the potential for the agent to learn in an environment, captured using Generalized Advantage Estimation, as the key factor to select the next environment(s) to train the agent.

    “Specifically, existing research has employed the potential for the agent to learn in an environment (captured using Generalized Advantage Estimation, GAE) as the key factor to select the next environment(s) to train the agent.”

    From Generalization through Diversity: Improving Unsupervised Environment Design (2023) · cites this paper as Schulman et al. , 2015

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 2,103

Authors
Schulman, J., Moritz, P., Levine, S., Jordan, M., & Abbeel, P.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1191599655
Cited by
2,103
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 198 · 2024: 368 · 2023: 336 · 2022: 275 · 2021: 327 · 2020: 247 · 2019: 162 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Conference on Learning Representations
Funders
Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
Keywords
generalized advantage estimation, policy gradient, continuous control, TD(lambda), trust-region optimization, value function, variance reduction, non-stationarity, 3D locomotion, biped robot, quadrupedal robots, simulated robots, running gait, model-free reinforcement learning, neural network policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review