High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimation
Open accessAbstract
Policy gradient methods are an appealing approach in reinforcement learning because they directly optimize the cumulative reward and can straightforwardly be used with nonlinear function approximators such as neural networks. The two main challenges are the large number of samples typically required, and the difficulty of obtaining stable and steady improvement despite the nonstationarity of the incoming data. We address the first challenge by using value functions to substantially reduce the variance of policy gradient estimates at the cost of some bias, with an exponentially-weighted estimator of the advantage function that is analogous to TD(lambda). We address the second challenge by using trust region optimization procedure for both the policy and the value function, which are represented by neural networks. Our approach yields strong empirical results on highly challenging 3D locomotion tasks, learning running gaits for bipedal and quadrupedal simulated robots, and learning a policy for getting the biped to stand up from starting out lying on the ground. In contrast to a body of prior work that uses hand-crafted policy representations, our neural network policies map directly from raw kinematics to joint torques. Our algorithm is fully model-free, and the amount of simulated experience required for the learning tasks on 3D bipeds corresponds to 1-2 weeks of real time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing research has employed the potential for the agent to learn in an environment, captured using Generalized Advantage Estimation, as the key factor to select the next environment(s) to train the agent.
“Specifically, existing research has employed the potential for the agent to learn in an environment (captured using Generalized Advantage Estimation, GAE) as the key factor to select the next environment(s) to train the agent.”
From Generalization through Diversity: Improving Unsupervised Environment Design (2023) · cites this paper as Schulman et al. , 2015
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 23 · Cited by 2,103
- Authors
- Schulman, J., Moritz, P., Levine, S., Jordan, M., & Abbeel, P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1506.02438
- OpenAlex
- W1191599655
- Cited by
- 2,103
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 198 · 2024: 368 · 2023: 336 · 2022: 275 · 2021: 327 · 2020: 247 · 2019: 162 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- International Conference on Learning Representations
- Funders
- Office of Naval Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
- Keywords
- generalized advantage estimation, policy gradient, continuous control, TD(lambda), trust-region optimization, value function, variance reduction, non-stationarity, 3D locomotion, biped robot, quadrupedal robots, simulated robots, running gait, model-free reinforcement learning, neural network policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review