The DOI matches its DataCite record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Doubled Color Codes
Open accessAbstract
We show how to perform a fault-tolerant universal quantum computation in 2D architectures using only transversal unitary operators and local syndrome measurements. Our approach is based on a doubled version of the 2D color code. It enables a transversal implementation of all logical gates in the Clifford+T basis using the gauge fixing method proposed recently by Paetznick and Reichardt. The gauge fixing requires six-qubit parity measurements for Pauli operators supported on faces of the honeycomb lattice with two qubits per site. Doubled color codes are promising candidates for the experimental demonstration of logical gates since they do not require state distillation. Secondly, we propose a Maximum Likelihood algorithm for the error correction and gauge fixing tasks that enables a numerical simulation of logical circuits in the Clifford+T basis. The algorithm can be used in the online regime such that a new error syndrome is revealed at each time step. We estimate the average number of logical gates that can be implemented reliably for the smallest doubled color code and a toy noise model that includes depolarizing memory errors and syndrome measurement errors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar code-switching principles apply to other families, such as the doubled color codes and quadratic residue codes.
“Similar code-switching principles apply to other families, such as the doubled color codes [115] and quadratic residue codes [116, 117].”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [115]
Citations
Cites
Good quantum error-correcting codes exist
Calderbank, A. R., & Shor, P. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1098 · Cited by 2,516
Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance
Barends, R., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., Veitia, A., Sank, D., Jeffrey, E., White, T. C., Mutus, J., Fowler, A. G., Campbell, B., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13171 · Cited by 1,733
Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates
Knill, E., Leibfried, D., Reichle, R., Britton, J., Blakestad, R. B., Jost, J. D., Langer, C., Ozeri, R., Seidelin, S., & Wineland, D. J. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.012307 · Cited by 1,019
High-threshold universal quantum computation on the surface code
Fowler, A. G., Stephens, A. M., & Groszkowski, P. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.052312 · Cited by 486 · cited 2×
“Although the surface code provides a low-overhead implementation of logical Clifford gates such as the CNOT or the Hadamard gate [5, 6], implementation of logical nonClifford gates poses a serious challenge.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers
Reiher, M., Wiebe, N., Svore, K. M., Wecker, D., & Troyer, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1619152114 · Cited by 745
Beverland, M. E., Kubica, A., & Svore, K. M. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020341 · Cited by 82
A fault-tolerant non-Clifford gate for the surface code in two dimensions
Brown, B. J. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay4929 · Cited by 77
“In the past, there has been a significant effort to realize a non-Clifford gate with two-dimensional quantum error– correcting codes ( 22 – 24 ).”
Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial
Spencer, D. J., Jain, S. P., Tanggara, A., Sun, Z., Haug, T., Khu, D., & Bharti, K. (2026) · arXiv
Metadata
- Authors
- Bravyi, S., & Cross, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1509.03239
- OpenAlex
- W2207863127
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Bulletin of the American Physical Society
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- fault-tolerant quantum computing, transversal gates, Clifford+T gates, gauge fixing, parity measurement, honeycomb lattice, logic gates, maximum likelihood decoding, error correction, depolarizing noise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
