The DOI matches its DataCite record.
A new inclination instability reshapes Keplerian disks into cones: application to the outer Solar System
Open accessAbstract
Disks of bodies orbiting a much more massive central object are extremely common in astrophysics. When the orbits comprising such disks are eccentric, we show they are susceptible to a new dynamical instability. Gravitational forces between bodies in the disk drive exponential growth of their orbital inclinations and clustering in their angles of pericenter, expanding an initially thin disk into a conical shape by giving each orbit an identical 'tilt' with respect to the disk plane. This new instability dynamically produces the unusual distribution of orbits observed for minor planets beyond Neptune, suggesting that the instability has shaped the outer Solar System. It also implies a large initial disk mass (1-10 Earth masses) of scattered bodies at hundreds of AU; we predict increasing numbers of detections of minor planets clustered in their angles of pericenter with high inclinations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The inclination instability requires 1-10 Earth masses of material between about 100 AU and 10,000 AU to operate on the appropriate timescale.
“Additionally, in order to operate on the appropriate timescale, the inclination instability requires 1 -10 Earth masses of material to exist between ∼ 100 AU and ∼ 10 , 000 AU (Madigan & McCourt 2015).”
From Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System (2016) · cites this paper as Madigan & McCourt 2015
The discussion (p. 5) says the proposed inclination-instability scenario implies an initial disk mass of approximately 1–10 Earth masses, but places it between approximately 50 and 10,000 AU, not 100 and 10,000 AU. The paper links the instability’s timescale to disk mass, but describes this mass as an implication of its Solar System scenario rather than a general requirement for the instability to operate. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System
Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Madigan, A.-M., & McCourt, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Madigan, Ann-Marie
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 457
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L89-L93
- ISSN
- 1745-3925 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1509.08920
- OpenAlex
- W2275524654
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
- Keywords
- Keplerian disk, eccentric orbits, gravitational interaction, outer solar system, trans-Neptunian objects, disk mass, orbital dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
