CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 994Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Semi-supervised Sequence Learning

Open access
Dai, Andrew M., Le, Quoc V.·2015·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1511.01432arXiv 1511.01432
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We present two approaches that use unlabeled data to improve sequence learning with recurrent networks. The first approach is to predict what comes next in a sequence, which is a conventional language model in natural language processing. The second approach is to use a sequence autoencoder, which reads the input sequence into a vector and predicts the input sequence again. These two algorithms can be used as a "pretraining" step for a later supervised sequence learning algorithm. In other words, the parameters obtained from the unsupervised step can be used as a starting point for other supervised training models. In our experiments, we find that long short term memory recurrent networks after being pretrained with the two approaches are more stable and generalize better. With pretraining, we are able to train long short term memory recurrent networks up to a few hundred timesteps, thereby achieving strong performance in many text classification tasks, such as IMDB, DBpedia and 20 Newsgroups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1511.01432

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Semi-supervised sequence learning has been shown to improve performance when presented with large amounts of unlabeled training data.

    “Semi-supervised sequence learning has been shown to improve performance when presented with large amounts of unlabeled training data (Dai and Le 2015).”

    From DeepHeart: Semi-Supervised Sequence Learning for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction (2018) · cites this paper as Dai and Le 2015

  • Preliminary work that applied transfer learning to NLP used a causal language modeling objective for pre-training.

    “Preliminary work that applied the transfer learning paradigm of pre-training and fine-tuning all of the model's parameters to NLP problems used a causal language modeling objective for pre-training (Dai and Le, 2015; Peters et al., 2018; Radford et al., 2018; Howard and Ruder, 2018).”

    From Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer (2019) · cites this paper as Dai and Le, 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 994

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [3][3] William Chan, Navdeep Jaitly, Quoc V Le, and Oriol Vinyals. Listen, attend and spell. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.01211 , 2015. - · arXiv
  2. [4][4] J. Chorowski, D. Bahdanau, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio. End-to-end continuous speech recognition using attention-based recurrent nn: First results. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.1602 , 2014. - · arXiv
  3. [5][5] Y. Dauphin and Y. Bengio. Stochastic ratio matching of RBMs for sparse high-dimensional inputs. In NIPS , 2013. -
  4. [10][10] S. Jean, K. Cho, R. Memisevic, and Y. Bengio. On using very large target vocabulary for neural machine translation. In ICML , 2014. -
  5. [11][11] R. Johnson and T. Zhang. Effective use of word order for text categorization with convolutional neural networks. In NAACL , 2014. -
  6. [12][12] Y. Kim. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In EMNLP , 2014. -
  7. [13][13] R. Kiros, Y. Zhu, R. Salakhutdinov, R. S. Zemel, A. Torralba, R. Urtasun, and S. Fidler. Skipthought vectors. In NIPS , 2015. -
  8. [16][16] K. Lang. Newsweeder: Learning to filter netnews. In ICML , 1995. -
  9. [17][17] H. Larochelle, M. Mandel, R. Pascanu, and Y. Bengio. Learning algorithms for the classification restricted boltzmann machine. JMLR , 2012. -
  10. [18][18] Q. V. Le and T. Mikolov. Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In ICML , 2014. -
  11. [20][20] T. Luong, I. Sutskever, Q. V. Le, O. Vinyals, and W. Zaremba. Addressing the rare word problem in neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.8206 , 2014. - · arXiv
  12. [21][21] A. L. Maas, R. E. Daly, P. T. Pham, D. Huang, A. Y. Ng, and C. Potts. Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. In ACL , 2011. -
  13. [22][22] J. McAuley and J. Leskovec. Hidden factors and hidden topics: understanding rating dimensions with review text. In RecSys , pages 165-172. ACM, 2013. -
  14. [24][24] J. Y. H. Ng, M. J. Hausknecht, S. Vijayanarasimhan, O. Vinyals, R. Monga, and G. Toderici. Beyond short snippets: Deep networks for video classification. In CVPR , 2015. -
  15. [25][25] B. Pang and L. Lee. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In ACL , 2005. -
  16. [27][27] L. Shang, Z. Lu, and H. Li. Neural responding machine for short-text conversation. In EMNLP , 2015. -
  17. [28][28] R. Socher, B. Huval, C. D. Manning, and A. Y. Ng. Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces. In EMNLP , 2012. -
  18. [29][29] R. Socher, A. Perelygin, J. Y . Wu, J. Chuang, C. D. Manning, A. Y . Ng, and C. Potts. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In EMNLP , 2013. -
  19. [31][31] I. Sutskever, O. Vinyals, and Q. V. Le. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In NIPS , 2014. -
  20. [32][32] O. Vinyals, L. Kaiser, T. Koo, S. Petrov, I. Sutskever, and G. Hinton. Grammar as a foreign language. In NIPS , 2015. -
  21. [33][33] O. Vinyals and Q. V. Le. A neural conversational model. In ICML Deep Learning Workshop , 2015. -
  22. [35][35] S. I. Wang and C. D. Manning. Baselines and bigrams: Simple, good sentiment and topic classification. In ACL , 2012. -
  23. [36][36] P. J. Werbos. Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences . PhD thesis, Harvard, 1974. -
  24. [37][37] W. Zaremba, I. Sutskever, and O. Vinyals. Recurrent neural network regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.2329 , 2014. - · arXiv
  25. [38][38] X. Zhang and Y. LeCun. Character-level convolutional networks for text classification. In NIPS , 2015.

Authors
Dai, A. M., & Le, Q. V.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
Volume
28
Pages
3079-3087
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1511.01432
arXiv
1511.01432
OpenAlex
W2170973209
Cited by
994
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 165 · 2020: 187 · 2019: 212 · 2018: 108 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • neural information processing systems
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
semi-supervised learning, sequence learning, recurrent neural networks, long short-term memory, language models, pre-training, unlabeled data, text classification, generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review