The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Kalman Filters
Open accessAbstract
Kalman Filters are one of the most influential models of time-varying phenomena. They admit an intuitive probabilistic interpretation, have a simple functional form, and enjoy widespread adoption in a variety of disciplines. Motivated by recent variational methods for learning deep generative models, we introduce a unified algorithm to efficiently learn a broad spectrum of Kalman filters. Of particular interest is the use of temporal generative models for counterfactual inference. We investigate the efficacy of such models for counterfactual inference, and to that end we introduce the "Healing MNIST" dataset where long-term structure, noise and actions are applied to sequences of digits. We show the efficacy of our method for modeling this dataset. We further show how our model can be used for counterfactual inference for patients, based on electronic health record data of 8,000 patients over 4.5 years.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deep formulation of classical ML models has been done, e.g. in Deep Kalman filters (DKFs) [302], Deep Variational Bayes Filters (DVBFs) [303], Structural Variational Autoencoders (SVAE) [304], or conditional random fields as RNNs [305].
“Deep formulation of classical ML models has been done, e.g. in Deep Kalman filters (DKFs) [302], Deep Variational Bayes Filters (DVBFs) [303], Structural Variational Autoencoders (SVAE) [304], or conditional random fields as RNNs [305].”
From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI (2020) · cites this paper as [302]
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 · Cited by 10,423
“Deep formulation of classical ML models has been done, e.g. in Deep Kalman filters (DKFs) [302] , Deep Variational Bayes Filters (DVBFs) [303] , Structural Variational Autoencoders (SVAE) [304] , or conditional random fields as RNNs [305] .”
Deep learning and its application to LHC physics
Guest, D., Cranmer, K., & Whiteson, D. (2018) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021019 · Cited by 417
Stochastic latent actor–critic: Deep reinforcement learning with a latent variable model
Lee, A. X., Nagabandi, A., Abbeel, P., & Levine, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.00953 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Krishnan, R. G., Shalit, U., & Sontag, D.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1511.05121
- OpenAlex
- W2176035349
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Keywords
- variational inference, deep generative models, counterfactual inference, electronic health records, stochastic modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
