PreprintCited by 2,004Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Return of Frustratingly Easy Domain Adaptation

Open access

Abstract

Unlike human learning, machine learning often fails to handle changes between training (source) and test (target) input distributions. Such domain shifts, common in practical scenarios, severely damage the performance of conventional machine learning methods. Supervised domain adaptation methods have been proposed for the case when the target data have labels, including some that perform very well despite being "frustratingly easy" to implement. However, in practice, the target domain is often unlabeled, requiring unsupervised adaptation. We propose a simple, effective, and efficient method for unsupervised domain adaptation called CORrelation ALignment (CORAL). CORAL minimizes domain shift by aligning the second-order statistics of source and target distributions, without requiring any target labels. Even though it is extraordinarily simple--it can be implemented in four lines of Matlab code--CORAL performs remarkably well in extensive evaluations on standard benchmark datasets.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1511.05547

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Discrepancy-based methods measure the feature distance between source and target domain by calculating pre-defined statistical metrics, in order to align their feature spaces.

    “Discrepancybased methods measure the feature distance between source and target domain by calculating pre-defined statistical metrics, in order to align their feature spaces [65], [66], [67].”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sun, B., Feng, J., & Saenko, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
Volume
30
Issue
1
ISSN
2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963275094
Cited by
2,004
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 113 · 2025: 184 · 2024: 246 · 2023: 274 · 2022: 236 · 2021: 315 · 2020: 254 · 2019: 186 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 2
FWCI
66.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1451244, 1212928)
  • Nvidia (Tesla K40)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
unsupervised domain adaptation, domain shift, coral, unlabeled target data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review