The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Return of Frustratingly Easy Domain Adaptation
Open accessAbstract
Unlike human learning, machine learning often fails to handle changes between training (source) and test (target) input distributions. Such domain shifts, common in practical scenarios, severely damage the performance of conventional machine learning methods. Supervised domain adaptation methods have been proposed for the case when the target data have labels, including some that perform very well despite being "frustratingly easy" to implement. However, in practice, the target domain is often unlabeled, requiring unsupervised adaptation. We propose a simple, effective, and efficient method for unsupervised domain adaptation called CORrelation ALignment (CORAL). CORAL minimizes domain shift by aligning the second-order statistics of source and target distributions, without requiring any target labels. Even though it is extraordinarily simple--it can be implemented in four lines of Matlab code--CORAL performs remarkably well in extensive evaluations on standard benchmark datasets.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Discrepancy-based methods measure the feature distance between source and target domain by calculating pre-defined statistical metrics, in order to align their feature spaces.
“Discrepancybased methods measure the feature distance between source and target domain by calculating pre-defined statistical metrics, in order to align their feature spaces [65], [66], [67].”
From Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Survey
Zhao, W., Queralta, J. P., & Westerlund, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · doi:10.1109/ssci47803.2020.9308468 · Cited by 941
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, B., Feng, J., & Saenko, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1511.05547
- OpenAlex
- W2963275094
- Cited by
- 2,004
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 113 · 2025: 184 · 2024: 246 · 2023: 274 · 2022: 236 · 2021: 315 · 2020: 254 · 2019: 186 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 66.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1451244, 1212928)
- Nvidia (Tesla K40)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- unsupervised domain adaptation, domain shift, coral, unlabeled target data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review