Characterizing the Demographics Behind the #BlackLivesMatter Movement
Open accessAbstract
The debates on minority issues are often dominated by or held among the concerned minority: gender equality debates have often failed to engage men, while those about race fail to effectively engage the dominant group. To test this observation, we study the #BlackLivesMatter}movement and hashtag on Twitter--which has emerged and gained traction after a series of events typically involving the death of African-Americans as a result of police brutality--and aim to quantify the population biases across user types (individuals vs. organizations), and (for individuals) across various demographics factors (race, gender and age). Our results suggest that more African-Americans engage with the hashtag, and that they are also more active than other demographic groups. We also discuss ethical caveats with broader implications for studies on sensitive topics (e.g. discrimination, mental health, or religion) that focus on users.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
External factors may impact quality dimensions of social datasets including coverage and representativeness, and affect reliability of observations.
“external factors may impact various quality dimensions of social datasets, including coverage and representativeness, yet they can also be subtle and easy to overlook, and affect the reliability of observations drawn from these datasets”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Olteanu et al., 2015
The Introduction (p. 2) says that hashtag-based analysis, reliance on one platform, and public APIs limit coverage, while the Exploratory Analysis (pp. 5–7) shows that events and attention peaks change which users participate and their demographic composition. These passages support the concern that observations can depend on coverage and representativeness, but the paper does not say that such factors are subtle or easy to overlook, or establish a general claim about all social datasets. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Tufekci, Z. (2014) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14517 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Inferring international and internal migration patterns from twitter data
Zagheni, E., Garimella, V. R. K., Weber, I., & State, B. (2014) · Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2567948.2576930 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [9][9] BAKHSHI, S., SHAMMA, D. A., AND GILBERT, E. Faces engage us: Photos with faces attract more likes and comments on instagram. In CHI (2014). -
- [16][16] WARD, J. A. The next dimension in public relations campaigns: A case study of the it gets better project. Public Relations Journal (2013). -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kıcıman, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00013 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kiciman, E. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2886526 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Olteanu, A., Weber, I., & Gatica-Perez, D.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- Pages
- 310-313
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1512.05671
- OpenAlex
- W2196654132
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- #BlackLivesMatter, Twitter, African Americans, racial demographics, gender, age, user types, police brutality, social movements, sensitive topics, research ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
