PreprintCited by 290Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAdvanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchRecommender Systems and Techniques

Deep Reinforcement Learning in Large Discrete Action Spaces

Open access
Dulac-Arnold, Gabriel, Evans, Richard, van Hasselt, Hado, Sunehag, Peter, Lillicrap, Timothy, Hunt, Jonathan, Mann, Timothy, Weber, Theophane +2 more·2015·arXiv

Abstract

Being able to reason in an environment with a large number of discrete actions is essential to bringing reinforcement learning to a larger class of problems. Recommender systems, industrial plants and language models are only some of the many real-world tasks involving large numbers of discrete actions for which current methods are difficult or even often impossible to apply. An ability to generalize over the set of actions as well as sub-linear complexity relative to the size of the set are both necessary to handle such tasks. Current approaches are not able to provide both of these, which motivates the work in this paper. Our proposed approach leverages prior information about the actions to embed them in a continuous space upon which it can generalize. Additionally, approximate nearest-neighbor methods allow for logarithmic-time lookup complexity relative to the number of actions, which is necessary for time-wise tractable training. This combined approach allows reinforcement learning methods to be applied to large-scale learning problems previously intractable with current methods. We demonstrate our algorithm's abilities on a series of tasks having up to one million actions.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1512.07679

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to DQL-based algorithms searching the whole action space, the trained DRL agent with DDPG and Wolpertinger architecture is able to achieve competitive cache hit rates while reducing the runtime.

    “Compared DQL-based algorithms searching the whole action space, the trained DRL agent with DDPG and Wolpertinger architecture is able to achieve competitive cache hit rates while reducing the runtime.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dulac-Arnold, G., Evans, R., van Hasselt, H., Sunehag, P., Lillicrap, T., Hunt, J., Mann, T., Weber, T., Degris, T., & Coppin, B.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394672593
Cited by
290
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
deep reinforcement learning, continuous action spaces, approximate nearest neighbor search, sublinear complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review