Deep Reinforcement Learning in Large Discrete Action Spaces
Open accessAbstract
Being able to reason in an environment with a large number of discrete actions is essential to bringing reinforcement learning to a larger class of problems. Recommender systems, industrial plants and language models are only some of the many real-world tasks involving large numbers of discrete actions for which current methods are difficult or even often impossible to apply. An ability to generalize over the set of actions as well as sub-linear complexity relative to the size of the set are both necessary to handle such tasks. Current approaches are not able to provide both of these, which motivates the work in this paper. Our proposed approach leverages prior information about the actions to embed them in a continuous space upon which it can generalize. Additionally, approximate nearest-neighbor methods allow for logarithmic-time lookup complexity relative to the number of actions, which is necessary for time-wise tractable training. This combined approach allows reinforcement learning methods to be applied to large-scale learning problems previously intractable with current methods. We demonstrate our algorithm's abilities on a series of tasks having up to one million actions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared to DQL-based algorithms searching the whole action space, the trained DRL agent with DDPG and Wolpertinger architecture is able to achieve competitive cache hit rates while reducing the runtime.
“Compared DQL-based algorithms searching the whole action space, the trained DRL agent with DDPG and Wolpertinger architecture is able to achieve competitive cache hit rates while reducing the runtime.”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [242]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2970550 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
“In addition, Wolpertinger architecture [242] is utilized to cope with the challenge of large action space.”
MethodA Closer Look at Invalid Action Masking in Policy Gradient Algorithms
Huang, S., & Ontañón, S. (2022) · The International FLAIRS Conference Proceedings · doi:10.32473/flairs.v35i.130584 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
A deep reinforcement learning-based framework for content caching
Zhong, C., Gursoy, M. C., & Velipasalar, S. (2018) · 2018 52nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS) · doi:10.1109/ciss.2018.8362276 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Generalization to New Actions in Reinforcement Learning
Jain, A., Szot, A., & Lim, J. J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.01928 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“• Continuous-output : The policy architecture outputs a continuous vector in the action representation space, following Dulac-Arnold et al. (2015).”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Dulac-Arnold, G., Evans, R., van Hasselt, H., Sunehag, P., Lillicrap, T., Hunt, J., Mann, T., Weber, T., Degris, T., & Coppin, B.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1512.07679
- OpenAlex
- W4394672593
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- deep reinforcement learning, continuous action spaces, approximate nearest neighbor search, sublinear complexity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review