The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.
Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality
Open accessAbstract
In this Letter we prove a simple theorem in quantum information theory, which implies that bulk operators in the Anti-de Sitter / Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence can be reconstructed as CFT operators in a spatial subregion $A$, provided that they lie in its entanglement wedge. This is an improvement on existing reconstruction methods, which have at most succeeded in the smaller causal wedge. The proof is a combination of the recent work of Jafferis, Lewkowycz, Maldacena, and Suh on the quantum relative entropy of a CFT subregion with earlier ideas interpreting the correspondence as a quantum error correcting code.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Assuming the gravitational entropy formula captures the true entropy of the exact state of radiation, these operators are changing this exact state.
“Assuming that this formula captures the true entropy of the exact state of radiation, this means that these operators are changing this exact state [74, 75], see also [76].”
From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [75]
The Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction section (p. 2) says bulk operators can be represented by operators supported on a boundary region, but only within a code subspace. The paper does not establish that these operators change the exact state of radiation, or that a gravitational entropy formula gives that state's true entropy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 64 · Cited by 541
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, X., Harlow, D., & Wall, A. C.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Advanced Study (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 021601-021601
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1601.05416
- OpenAlex
- W2470729034
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 14
- FWCI
- 22.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (NSF PHY-11-25915)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DEFG0291ER40654, DESC0009988)
- Simons Foundation
- Institute for Advanced Study
- Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- entanglement wedge, AdS/CFT correspondence, gauge/gravity duality, quantum relative entropy, quantum error-correcting codes, quantum information, holography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
