CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 20Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionWeb Data Mining and AnalysisMobile and Web Applications

MyAdChoices: Bringing Transparency and Control to Online Advertising

Open access
Parra-Arnau, Javier, Achara, Jagdish Prasad, Castelluccia, Claude·2016·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1602.02046arXiv 1602.02046
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The intrusiveness and the increasing invasiveness of online advertising have, in the last few years, raised serious concerns regarding user privacy and Web usability. As a reaction to these concerns, we have witnessed the emergence of a myriad of ad-blocking and anti-tracking tools, whose aim is to return control to users over advertising. The problem with these technologies, however, is that they are extremely limited and radical in their approach: users can only choose either to block or allow all ads. With around 200 million people regularly using these tools, the economic model of the Web ---in which users get content free in return for allowing advertisers to show them ads--- is at serious peril. In this paper, we propose a smart Web technology that aims at bringing transparency to online advertising, so that users can make an informed and equitable decision regarding ad blocking. The proposed technology is implemented as a Web-browser extension and enables users to exert fine-grained control over advertising, thus providing them with certain guarantees in terms of privacy and browsing experience, while preserving the Internet economic model. Experimental results in a real environment demonstrate the suitability and feasibility of our approach, and provide preliminary findings on behavioral targeting from real user browsing profiles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1602.02046

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Google and Pinterest offer similar features: on Google it is called Similar Audiences, and on Pinterest it is called Actalike Audiences.

    “Google and Pinterest offer similar features: on Google it is called Similar Audiences[40], and on Pinterest it is called Actalike Audiences[63].”

    From Discrimination through Optimization (2019) · cites this paper as [63]

    The citation to this paper is attached to the Google portion of the sentence, not the Pinterest portion. The Results (p. 19) discuss Google's ad-platform tracking, and User-Targeting Objectives (p. 4) discusses interest-based targeting, but neither identifies a Google feature called “Similar Audiences.” Searches for that name and for Google lookalike-audience targeting found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. [16][16] J. Parra-Arnau, D. Rebollo-Monedero, and J. Forn´ e, 'Measuring the privacy of user profiles in personalized information systems,' Future Gen. Comput. Syst. (FGCS), Special Issue Data, Knowl. Eng. , vol. 33, pp. 53-63, Apr. 2014. [Online]. Available: http: //dx . doi . org/10 . 1016/j . future . 2013 . 01 . 001 -
  2. [17][17] D. Rebollo-Monedero, J. Parra-Arnau, and J. Forn´ e, 'An informationtheoretic privacy criterion for query forgery in information retrieval,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Secur. Technol.(SecTech) , ser. Commun. Comput., Inform. Sci. (CCIS), vol. 259. Jeju Island, South Korea: SpringerVerlag, Dec. 2011, pp. 146-154. -
  3. [19][19] S. Yuan, A. Z. Abidin, M. Sloan, and J. Wang, 'Internet advertising: An interplay among advertisers, online publishers, ad exchanges and web users,' arXiv: 1206.1754 , 2012, arXiv preprint. - · arXiv
  4. [22][22] B. Liu, A. Sheth, U. Weinsberg, J. Chandrashekar, and R. Govindan, 'Adreveal: Improving transparency into online targeted advertising,' in Proc. Hot Topics in Netw. ACM, 2013, pp. 12:1-12:7. -
  5. [23][23] J. Yan, N. Liu, G. Wang, W. Zhang, Y. Jiang, and Z. Chen, 'How much can behavioral targeting help online advertising?' in Proc. Int. WWW Conf. ACM, 2009, pp. 261-270. -
  6. [24][24] M. Aly, A. Hatch, V. Josifovski, and V. K. Narayanan, 'Web-scale user modeling for targeting,' in Proc. Int. WWW Conf. ACM, 2012, pp. 3-12. -
  7. [25][25] M. M. Tsang, S. C. Ho, and T. P. Liang, 'Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: An empirical study,' Int. J. Electron. Commer. , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 65-78, 2004. -
  8. [28][28] V. Toubiana, A. Narayanan, D. Boneh, H. Nissenbaum, and S. Barocas, 'Adnostic: Privacy preserving targeted advertising,' in Proc. IEEE Symp. Netw. Distrib. Syst. Secur. (SNDSS) , Feb. 2010, pp. 1-21. -
  9. [30][30] S. Pandey, M. Aly, A. Bagherjeiran, A. Hatch, P. Ciccolo, A. Ratnaparkhi, and M. Zinkevich, 'Learning to target: What works for behavioral targeting,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Inform., Knowl. Manage. (CIKM) . ACM, 2011, pp. 1805-1814. -
  10. [36][36] L. Olejnik, 'Measuring the privacy risks and value of web tracking,' Ph.D. dissertation, Nat. Inst. Res. Comput. Sci., Contr. (INRIA), Jan. 2015. -
  11. [38][38] T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory , 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2006. -
  12. [39][39] S. Puglisi, D. Rebollo-Monedero, and J. Forn´ e, 'You never surf alone. ubiquitous tracking of users browsing habits,' in Proc. Int. Workshop Data Priv. Manage. (DPM) , ser. Lecture Notes Comput. Sci. (LNCS), Vienna, Austria, Sep. 2015. -
  13. [40][40] S. Gauch, M. Speretta, A. Chandramouli, and A. Micarelli, The adaptive Web . Springer-Verlag, 2007, ch. User profiles for personalized information access, pp. 54-89. -
  14. [41][41] S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004. -
  15. [42][42] B. C. Levy, Principles of Signal Detection and Parameter Estimation , 1st ed. Springer-Verlag, 2008. -
  16. [43][43] A. M. Zoubir, V. Koivunen, and Y. C. M. Muma, 'Robust estimation in signal processing: A tutorial-style treatment of fundamental concepts,' IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 61-80, Jul. 2012. -
  17. [44][44] T.-D. Nguyen, 'Robust estimation, regression and ranking with applications in portfolio optimization,' Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Jun. 2009. -
  18. [45][45] K. Yang, Y. Wu, J. Huang, X. Wang, and S. Verdu, 'Distributed robust optimization for communication networks,' in Proc. Joint Conf. IEEE Comput., Commun. Soc. (INFOCOM) , 2008. -
  19. [46][46] P. Kouvelis and G. Yu, Robust Discrete Optimization and Its Applications , 1st ed. Springer-Verlag, Nov. 1996. -
  20. [48][48] E. T. Jaynes, 'On the rationale of maximum-entropy methods,' Proc. IEEE , vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 939-952, Sep. 1982. -
  21. [49][49] --, 'Information theory and statistical mechanics II,' Phys. Review Ser. II , vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 171-190, 1957. -
  22. [50][50] E. Ferrari and B. Thuraisingham. Artech House, Inc., 2000, ch. Secure Database Systems, pp. 353-403. -
  23. [52][52] L. Olejnik, T. Minh-Dung, and C. Castelluccia, 'Selling off privacy at auction,' in Proc. IEEE Symp. Netw. Distrib. Syst. Secur. (SNDSS) , Feb. 2014. -
  24. [53][53] G. Acar, C. Eubank, S. Englehardt, M. Juarez, A. Narayanan, and C. Diaz., 'The web never forgets: Persistent tracking mechanisms in the wild,' in Proc. ACM Conf. Comput., Commun. Secur. (CCS) , Washington, DC, Nov. 2014, pp. 674-689. -
  25. [54][54] M. J. Schervish, Theory of Statistics . New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995. -
  26. [56][56] A. Soltani, S. Canty, Q. Mayo, L. Thomas, , and C. J. Hoofnagle, 'Flash cookies and privacy,' in Proc. AAAI Spring Symp. Intell. Inform. Priv. Manage. Assoc. Adv. Artif. Intell., 2010. -
  27. [58][58] K. Mowery and H. Shacham, 'Pixel perfect: Fingerprinting canvas in HTML5,' in Proc. IEEE Web 2.0 Workshop Secur., Priv. (W2SP) . IEEE Comput. Soc., May 2012. -
  28. [61][61] R. Lougee-Heimer, 'The Common Optimization INterface for Operations Research: Promoting open-source software in the operations research community,' IMB J. Res. Develop. , vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 57-66, Jan. 2003. -
  29. [63][63] E. M. Gertz and S. J. Wright, 'Object-oriented software for quadratic programming,' ACM Trans. Math. Softw. , vol. 29, pp. 58-81, 2003. -
  30. [65][65] B. Borchers, 'CSDP, a C library for semidefinite programming,' Optim. Method, Softw. , vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 613-623, 1999. -
  31. [66][66] S. J. Benson, Y. Ye, and X. Zhang, 'Solving large-scale sparse semidefinite programs for combinatorial optimization,' (SIAM) J. Optim. , vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 443-461, 2000. -
  32. [68][68] A. W¨ achter and L. T. Biegler, 'On the implementation of a primaldual interior point filter line search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming,' Math. Program. , vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 25-57, 2006. -
  33. [69][69] C. Zhu, R. H. Byrd, and J. Nocedal, 'L-bfgs-b: Algorithm 778: L-bfgs-b fortran routines for large scale bound constrained optimization,' ACM Trans. Math. Softw. , vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 550-560, 2007. -
  34. [71][71] A. Kae, K. Kan, V. K. Narayanan, and D. Yankov, 'Categorization of display ads using image and landing page features,' in Proc. ICDM Workshop Large-Scale Data Min.: Theory, Appl. ACM, 2011, pp. 1-8. [Online]. Available: http://doi . acm . org/10 . 1145/2002945 . 2002946 -
  35. [72][72] B. J. Jansen, 'Click fraud,' IEEE Comput. , vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 85-86, Jul. 2007. -
  36. [74][74] C. D. Manning and H. Sch¨ utze, Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing . Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1999. -
  37. [75][75] G. A. Miller, 'WordNet: A lexical database for english,' Commun. ACM , vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 39-41, 1995. -
  38. [76][76] B. Magnini and G. Cavagli` a, 'Integrating subject field codes into wordnet,' in Proc. Lang. Resource, Evaluation (LREC) , Jun. 2000, pp. 1413-1418. -
  39. [77][77] L. Bentivogli, P. Forner, B. Magnini, and E. Pianta, 'Revising wordnet domains hierarchy: Semantics, coverage, and balancing,' in Proc. PostCOLING Workshop Multiling. Ling. Resources , Hangzhou, China, Aug. 2004, pp. 101-108. -
  40. [78][78] A. Gonzalez-Agirre, E. Laparra, and G. Rigau, 'Multilingual central repository version 3.0: upgrading a very large lexical knowledge base,' in Proc. Global WordNet Conf. , 2012. -
  41. [79][79] J. Daud´ e, , L. Padr´ o, and G. Rigau, 'Validation and tuning of wordnet mapping techniques,' Proc. Int. Conf. Recent Adv. Nat. Lang. Process. (RANLP) , Sep. 2003. -
  42. [80][80] G. Salton, A. Wong, and C. S. Yang, 'A vector space model for automatic indexing,' Commun. ACM , vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 613-620, 1975. -
  43. [81][81] J. Currie and D. I. Wilson, 'OPTI: Lowering the barrier between open source optimizers and the industrial Matlab user,' in Proc. Found. Comput.-Aided Process Oper. , Jan. 2012. -
  44. [84][84] M. Lecuyer, G. Ducoffe, F. Lan, A. Papancea, T. Petsios, R. Spahn, A. Chaintreau, and R. Geambasu, 'XRay: Enhancing the web's transparency with differential correlation,' in Proc. Conf. USENIX Secur. Symp. , Aug. 2014. -
  45. [85][85] A. Datta, M. C. Tschantz, and A. Datta, 'Automated experiments on ad privacy settings,' in Proc. Int. Symp. Priv. Enhanc. Technol. (PETS) , Darmstadt, Germany, Jul. 2015. -
  46. [86][86] M. Lecuyer, R. Spahn, Y. Spiliopoulos, A. Chaintreau, R. Geambasu, and D. Hsu, 'Sunlight: finegrained targeting detection at scale with statistical confidence,' in Proc. ACM Conf. Comput., Commun. Secur. (CCS) , Aug. 2015. -
  47. [87][87] J. M. Carrascosa, J. Mikians, R. Cuevas, V. Erramilli, and N. Laoutaris, 'I always feel like somebody's watching me. measuring online behavioural advertising,' in Proc. ACM Int. Emerg. Netw. Experiments, Technol. (CoNEXT) , Heidelberg, Germany, Dec. 2015. -
  48. [88][88] K. G. Allen, 'Search marketing tops online retail customer acquisition tactics,' NFR, Tech. Rep., Jul. 2014, accessed on 2016-01-11. [Online]. Available: https://nrf . com/media/press-releases/shoporgforrester-searchmarketing-tops-online-retail-customer-acquisition -
  49. [98][98] P. Barford, I. Canadi, D. Krushevskaja, Q. Ma, and S. Muthukrishnan, 'Adscape: Harvesting and analyzing online display ads,' in Proc. ACM Int. WWW Conf. ACM, 2014, pp. 597-608. -
  50. [99][99] S. Guha, B. Cheng, and P. Francis, 'Challenges in measuring online advertising systems,' in Proc. ACM Internet Meas. Conf. (IMC) , Melbourne, Australia, Nov. 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parra-Arnau, J., Achara, J. P., & Castelluccia, C.
Affiliations
Centre Inria de l'Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1602.02046
arXiv
1602.02046
OpenAlex
W2950337464
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile and Web Applications
Keywords
online advertising, ad blocking, user privacy, browser extension, advertising transparency, behavioral targeting, website usability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review