PreprintCited by 26Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationText and Document Classification Technologies

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross-Language Domain Adaptation for Classifying Crisis-Related Short Messages

Open access

Abstract

Rapid crisis response requires real-time analysis of messages. After a disaster happens, volunteers attempt to classify tweets to determine needs, e.g., supplies, infrastructure damage, etc. Given labeled data, supervised machine learning can help classify these messages. Scarcity of labeled data causes poor performance in machine training. Can we reuse old tweets to train classifiers? How can we choose labeled tweets for training? Specifically, we study the usefulness of labeled data of past events. Do labeled tweets in different language help? We observe the performance of our classifiers trained using different combinations of training sets obtained from past disasters. We perform extensive experimentation on real crisis datasets and show that the past labels are useful when both source and target events are of the same type (e.g. both earthquakes). For similar languages (e.g., Italian and Spanish), cross-language domain adaptation was useful, however, when for different languages (e.g., Italian and English), the performance decreased.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1602.05388

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Applying labeled data for short text analysis to train the classification model is challenging if the language used in test data differs from the training dataset.

    “Applying labeled data for short text analysis to train the classification model is challenging if the language used in test data differs from the training dataset [151].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]1. Ashktorab, Z., Brown, C., Nandi, M., & Culotta, A. (2014). Tweedr: Mining twitter to inform disaster response. Proc. of ISCRAM.
  2. [2]2. Cameron, M. A., Power. A., Robinson, B., and Yin, J. (2012). Emergency Situation Awareness from Twitter for Crisis Management. In Proc. Conference on World Wide Web (WWW).
  3. [3]3. Caragea, C., McNeese, N., Jaiswal, A., Traylor, G., Kim, H. W., Mitra, P., Wu, D., Tapia, A., Giles, L., Jansen, B., & Yen, J. (2011, May). Classifying text messages for the haiti earthquake. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on information systems for crisis response and management (ISCRAM 2011) . Long Paper - Social Media Studies Proceedings of the ISCRAM 2016 Conference - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, May 2016 Tapia, Antunes, Bañuls, Moore and Porto,eds.
  4. [5]5. Hughes, A. L., & Palen, L. (2009). Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. International Journal of Emergency Management , 6 (3-4), 248-260.
  5. [6]6. Imran, M., Elbassuoni, S. M., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Meier, P. (2013a). Extracting information nuggets from disaster-related messages in social media. Proc. of ISCRAM, Baden-Baden, Germany .
  6. [7]7. Imran, M., Lykourentzou, I., Naudet, Y., & Castillo, C. (2013b). Engineering crowdsourced stream processing systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.5463. · arXiv
  7. [8]8. Imran, M., Castillo, C., Lucas, J., Meier, P., & Vieweg, S. (2014). AIDR: Artificial intelligence for disaster response. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web companion (pp. 159-162). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.
  8. [10]10. Liaw, A., & Wiener, M. (2002). Classification and regression by Random Forest. R news , 2 (3), 18-22.
  9. [12]12. Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., & Castillo, C. (2010, July). Twitter Under Crisis: Can we trust what we RT?. In Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics (pp. 71-79). ACM.
  10. [13]13. MacEachren, A. M., Jaiswal, A., Robinson, A. C., Pezanowski, S., Savelyev, A., Mitra, P., Zhang, X., & Blanford, J. (2011, October). Senseplace2: Geotwitter analytics support for situational awareness. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2011 IEEE Conference on (pp. 181-190). IEEE.
  11. [14]14. Neubig, G., Matsubayashi, Y., Hagiwara, M. and Murakami, K. (2011). Safety information mining - what can NLP do in a disaster. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP)
  12. [15]15. Olteanu, A., Vieweg, S., & Castillo, C. (2015, February). What to expect when the unexpected happens: Social media communications across crises. In Proceedings of CSCW, (pp. 994-1009). ACM.
  13. [16]16. Palen, L., Vieweg, S., Liu, S. B., & Hughes, A. L. (2009). Crisis in a networked world features of computermediated communication in the April 16, 2007, Virginia Tech Event. Social Science Computer Review , 27 (4).
  14. [17]17. Power, R., Robinson, B., Colton, J., & Cameron, M. (2014). Emergency situation awareness: Twitter case studies. In Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management in Mediterranean Countries (pp. 218-231).
  15. [18]18. Roy Chowdhury, S., Imran, M., Asghar, M. R., Amer-Yahia, S., & Castillo, C. (2013). Tweet4act: Using incident-specific profiles for classifying crisis-related messages. In 10th International ISCRAM Conference , Baden-Baden, Germany .
  16. [19]19. Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M. and Matsuo, Y. (2010). Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proc. World Wide Web Conference (WWW).
  17. [20]20. Starbird, K., Palen, L., Hughes, A. L., & Vieweg, S. (2010, February). Chatter on the red: what hazards threat reveals about the social life of microblogged information. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 241-250). ACM.
  18. [21]21. Vieweg, S., Hughes, A. L., Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2010, April). Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In Proc. SIGCHI, (pp. 1079-1088). ACM.
  19. [22]22. Vieweg, S., Castillo, C., & Imran, M. (2014). Integrating social media communications into the rapid assessment of sudden onset disasters. In Social Informatics (pp. 444-461). Springer International Publishing.
  20. [23]23. Qu, Y., Huang, C., Zhang, P., and Zhang, J. (2011). Microblogging After a Major Disaster in China: A Case Study of the 2010 Yushu Earthquake. In Proc. CSCW.
  21. [24]24. Yin, J., Lampert, A., Cameron, M., Robinson, B., & Power, R. (2012). Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. IEEE Intelligent Systems , (6), 52-59.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Imran, M., Mitra, P., & Srivastava, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2280776734
Cited by
26
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
Keywords
crisis response, short text classification, multilingual text

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review