Generating Visual Explanations
Open accessAbstract
Clearly explaining a rationale for a classification decision to an end-user can be as important as the decision itself. Existing approaches for deep visual recognition are generally opaque and do not output any justification text; contemporary vision-language models can describe image content but fail to take into account class-discriminative image aspects which justify visual predictions. We propose a new model that focuses on the discriminating properties of the visible object, jointly predicts a class label, and explains why the predicted label is appropriate for the image. We propose a novel loss function based on sampling and reinforcement learning that learns to generate sentences that realize a global sentence property, such as class specificity. Our results on a fine-grained bird species classification dataset show that our model is able to generate explanations which are not only consistent with an image but also more discriminative than descriptions produced by existing captioning methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Local interpretations can only represent a certain portion of any and all potential actions, i.e., they can only describe one forecast in a particular circumstance.
“Local interpretations can only represent a certain portion of any and all potential actions, i.e., they can only describe one forecast in a particular circumstance [92].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [92]
Cites
Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions
Karpathy, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298932 · Cited by 4,902 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 · Cited by 10,423 · see citing works
Gatt, A., & Krahmer, E. (2018) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.5477 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?
Holzinger, A., Biemann, C., Pattichis, C. S., & Kell, D. B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.09923 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Evaluating the quality of machine learning explanations: a survey on methods and metrics
Zhou, J., Gandomi, A. H., Chen, F., & Holzinger, A. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10050593 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidence
Park, D. H., Hendricks, L. A., Akata, Z., Rohrbach, A., Schiele, B., Darrell, T., & Rohrbach, M. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00915 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluating XAI: A comparison of rule-based and example-based explanations
van der Waa, J., Nieuwburg, E., Cremers, A., & Neerincx, M. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2020.103404 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Chamola, V., Hassija, V., Sulthana, A. R., Ghosh, D., Dhingra, D., & Sikdar, B. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294569 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Kenny, E. M., Ford, C., Quinn, M., & Keane, M. T. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103459 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hendricks, L. A., Akata, Z., Rohrbach, M., Donahue, J., Schiele, B., & Darrell, T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Max Planck Institute for Informatics (DE)
- International Computer Science Institute (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1603.08507
- OpenAlex
- W2949467366
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1427425, 1212798, N000141110688)
- Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (N000141110688)
- Air Force Research Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- explainable classification, vision-language models, reinforcement learning, image captioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
