PreprintCited by 182IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AITechnology and Security Systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

The Internet of Things: New Interoperability, Management and Security Challenges

Open access

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) brings connectivity to about every objects found in the physical space. It extends connectivity to everyday objects. From connected fridges, cars and cities, the IoT creates opportunities in numerous domains. However, this increase in connectivity creates many prominent challenges. This paper provides a survey of some of the major issues challenging the widespread adoption of the IoT. Particularly, it focuses on the interoperability, management, security and privacy issues in the IoT. It is concluded that there is a need to develop a multifaceted technology approach to IoT security, management, and privacy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1604.04824

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. M. Elkhodr, S. Shahrestani, and H. Cheung, "A Semantic Obfuscation Technique for the Internet of Things," in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Sydney, Australia, 2014, pp. 448 -453.
  2. L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito, "The Internet of Things: A survey," Computer Networks, vol. 54, pp. 2787-2805, 2010.
  3. "IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries," IEEE Std 610, pp. 1-217, 1991.
  4. A. E. Andargoli, P. Bernus, and H. Kandjani, "Analysis of Interoperability in the Queensland Disaster Management System," in ICEIS (3), 2013, pp. 310-317.
  5. S. Kumar, M. Bhardwaj, and A. Q. Bhat, "Study of Wireless Sensor Networks its Routing Challenges and Available Sensor Nodes," in International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 2013.
  6. C. H. Liu, B. Yang, and T. Liu, "Efficient naming, addressing and profile services in Internet-of- Things sensory environments," Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 18, pp. 85-101, 7// 2014.
  7. Q. Zhu, R. Wang, Q. Chen, Y. Liu, and W. Qin, "Iot gateway: Bridgingwireless sensor networks into internet of things," in 2010 IEEE/IFIP 8th International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC), 2010, pp. 347-352.
  8. R. R. Kujur and A. Dwivedi, "Exploration of Existing Frameworks for Connecting Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) with Current Internet," International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 86, 2014.
  9. M. Blackstock and R. Lea, "Toward interoperability in a web of things," in Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication, 2013, pp. 1565-1574.
  10. M. Welsh and G. Mainland, "Programming Sensor Networks Using Abstract Regions," in NSDI, 2004, pp. 3-3.
  11. Y.-K. Chen, "Challenges and opportunities of internet of things," in 2012 17th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), 2012, pp. 383-388.
  12. C. C. Aggarwal, N. Ashish, and A. Sheth, "The internet of things: A survey from the data-centric perspective," in Managing and mining sensor data, ed: Springer, 2013, pp. 383-428.
  13. N. A. Ali and M. Abu-Elkheir, "Data management for the internet of things: Green directions," in Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), 2012, pp. 386-390.
  14. M. Chui, M. Löffler, and R. Roberts, "The internet of things," McKinsey Quarterly, vol. 2, pp. 1-9, 2010.
  15. L. Yang, S. Yang, and L. Plotnick, "How the internet of things technology enhances emergency response operations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 80, pp. 1854-1867, 2013.
  16. M. Elkhodr, S. Shahrestani, and H. Cheung, "A Review of Mobile Location Privacy in the Internet of Things," in 2012 Tenth International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering, Bangkok, Thailand, 2012, pp. 266-272.
  17. M. H. Behringer, "End-to-End Security," The Internet Protocol Journal, vol. 12, p. 20, 2009.
  18. G. Summers, "Data and databases," Koehne, H Developing Databases with Access: Nelson Australia Pty Limited, pp. 4-5, 2004.
  19. R. Roman, P. Najera, and J. Lopez, "Securing the Internet of Things," Computer, vol. 44, pp. 51- 58, 2011.
  20. H. Suo, J. Wan, C. Zou, and J. Liu, "Security in the internet of things: a review," in 2012 International Conference onComputer Science and Electronics Engineering (ICCSEE),, 2012, pp. 648-651.
  21. R. Roman, C. Alcaraz, J. Lopez, and N. Sklavos, "Key management systems for sensor networks in the context of the Internet of Things," Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 37, pp. 147- 159, 2011.
  22. C. Doukas and I. Maglogiannis, "Bringing IoT and cloud computing towards pervasive healthcare," presented at the Sixth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS), Palermo, Italy, 2012.
  23. J. Mirkovic and P. Reiher, "A taxonomy of DDoS attack and DDoS defense mechanisms," ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 34, pp. 39-53, 2004.
  24. G. Gang, L. Zeyong, and J. Jun, "Internet of things security analysis," in 2011 International Conference on Internet Technology and Applications (iTAP), 2011, pp. 1-4.
  25. S. Misra, P. V. Krishna, H. Agarwal, A. Saxena, and M. S. Obaidat, "A learning automata based solution for preventing distributed denial of service in Internet of things," in 2011 International Conference on and 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, 2011, pp. 114-122.
  26. T. Heer, O. Garcia-Morchon, R. Hummen, S. L. Keoh, S. S. Kumar, and K. Wehrle, "Security Challenges in the IP-based Internet of Things," Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 61, pp. 527-542, 2011.
  27. D. Mansouri, L. Mokdad, J. Ben-Othman, and M. Ioualalen, "Detecting DoS attacks in WSN based on clustering technique," in Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2013, pp. 2214-2219.
  28. D. Martynov, J. Roman, S. Vaidya, and H. Fu, "Design and implementation of an intrusion detection system for wireless sensor networks," in IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology, 2007, pp. 507-512.
  29. S. Raza, L. Wallgren, and T. Voigt, "SVELTE: Real-time intrusion detection in the Internet of Things," Ad hoc networks, vol. 11, pp. 2661-2674, 2013.
  30. S. T. Zargar, J. Joshi, and D. Tipper, "A survey of defense mechanisms against distributed denial of service (DDoS) flooding attacks," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 15, pp. 2046-2069, 2013.
  31. N. Ye, Y. Zhu, R.-C. Wang, R. Malekian, and L. Qiao-min, "An Efficient Authentication and Access Control Scheme for Perception Layer of Internet of Things," Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 1617-1624, Jul 2014 2014-03-22 2014.
  32. L. Wang, D. Wijesekera, and S. Jajodia, "A logic-based framework for attribute based access control," presented at the ACM workshop on Formal methods in security engineering, NY, USA, 2004.
  33. Q. Han and J. Li, "An authorization management approach in the internet of things," Journal of Information & Computational Science, vol. 9, pp. 1705-1713, 2012.
  34. D. R. Kuhn, E. J. Coyne, and T. R. Weil, "Adding attributes to role-based access control," Computer, pp. 79-81, 2010.
  35. M. Elkhodr, S. Shahrestani, and H. Cheung, "The Internet of Things: Vision & Challenges," in IEEE Tencon Spring 2013, Sydney, Australia, 2013, pp. 218 -222.
  36. B. Hoh, M. Gruteser, H. Xiong, and A. Alrabady, "Enhancing security and privacy in traffic- monitoring systems," IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 5, pp. 38-46, 2006.
  37. M. Elkhodr, S. Shahrestani, and H. Cheung, "A Review of Mobile Location Privacy in the Internet of Things," in IEEE Tenth International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering, Bangkok, Thailand, 2012, pp. 266-272.

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Elkhodr, M., Shahrestani, S., & Cheung, H.
Affiliations
Western Sydney University (AU)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
85-102
ISSN
0974-9330 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2321624443
Cited by
182
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6
FWCI
15.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Technology and Security Systems
Keywords
Internet of Things, interoperability, Internet of Things security, privacy, IoT management, IoT devices, IoT adoption challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Internet of Things: New Interoperability, Management and Security Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1604.04824
The paper
Elkhodr, M., Shahrestani, S., & Cheung, H. (2016). The Internet of Things: New Interoperability, Management and Security Challenges. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1604.04824