Preprint

The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Measurement Techniques for Thermal Conductivity and Interfacial Thermal Conductance of Bulk and Thin Film Materials

Zhao, Dongliang, Qian, Xin, Gu, Xiaokun, Jajja, Saad Ayub, Yang, Ronggui·2016·arXiv

Abstract

Thermal conductivity and interfacial thermal conductance play crucial roles in the design of engineering systems where temperature and thermal stress are of concerns. To date, a variety of measurement techniques are available for both bulk and thin film solid-state materials with a broad temperature range. For thermal characterization of bulk material, the steady-state absolute method, laser flash diffusivity method, and transient plane source method are most used. For thin film measurement, the 3ω method and transient thermoreflectance technique including both frequency-domain and time-domain analysis are employed widely. This work reviews several most commonly used measurement techniques. In general, it is a very challenging task to determine thermal conductivity and interface contact resistance with less than 5% error. Selecting a specific measurement technique to characterize thermal properties need to be based on: 1) knowledge on the sample whose thermophysical properties is to be determined, including the sample geometry and size, and preparation method; 2) understanding of fundamentals and procedures of the testing technique and equipment, for example, some techniques are limited to samples with specific geometrics and some are limited to specific range of thermophysical properties; 3) understanding of the potential error sources which might affect the final results, for example, the convection and radiation heat losses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1605.08469

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, D., Qian, X., Gu, X., Jajja, S. A., & Yang, R.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review