The DOI matches its DataCite record; 32 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimization
Open accessAbstract
Generative neural samplers are probabilistic models that implement sampling using feedforward neural networks: they take a random input vector and produce a sample from a probability distribution defined by the network weights. These models are expressive and allow efficient computation of samples and derivatives, but cannot be used for computing likelihoods or for marginalization. The generative-adversarial training method allows to train such models through the use of an auxiliary discriminative neural network. We show that the generative-adversarial approach is a special case of an existing more general variational divergence estimation approach. We show that any f-divergence can be used for training generative neural samplers. We discuss the benefits of various choices of divergence functions on training complexity and the quality of the obtained generative models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
GAN（Generative Adversarial Nets）
淳司, 柴. (2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 20,507
Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks
Radford, A., Metz, L., & Chintala, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.06434 · Cited by 12,235
Improved Techniques for Training GANs
Salimans, T., Goodfellow, I., Zaremba, W., Cheung, V., Radford, A., & Chen, X. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.03498 · Cited by 6,965
Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
Gneiting, T., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000001437 · Cited by 5,793
Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)
Clevert, D.-A., Unterthiner, T., & Hochreiter, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.07289 · Cited by 4,513
Stochastic Backpropagation and Approximate Inference in Deep Generative ModelsPreprint
Rezende, D. J., Mohamed, S., & Wierstra, D. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1401.4082 · Cited by 3,921
Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networks
Graves, A. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1308.0850 · Cited by 2,894
Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics
Sohl-Dickstein, J., Weiss, E. A., Maheswaranathan, N., & Ganguli, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.03585 · Cited by 2,637
LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the LoopPreprint
Yu, F., Seff, A., Zhang, Y., Song, S., Funkhouser, T., & Xiao, J. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.03365 · Cited by 2,318
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [10][10] I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. In NIPS , pages 2672-2680, 2014. -
- [18][18] D. P. Kingma and M. Welling. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. arXiv:1402.0030 , 2013. - · arXiv
- [23][23] A. Makhzani, J. Shlens, N. Jaitly, and I. Goodfellow. Adversarial autoencoders. arXiv:1511.05644 , 2015. - · arXiv
- [32][32] S. Tokui, K. Oono, S. Hido, and J. Clayton. Chainer: a next-generation open source framework for deep learning. In NIPS , 2015. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,002 of 1,002
Social Reality Construction via Active Inference: Modeling the Dialectic of Conformity and Creativity
Nomura, K., & Horii, T. (2026) · arXiv
“The discriminator D kψ ( z , o ) is trained under the f -GAN framework (Nowozin et al., 2016), which generalizes generative adversarial networks (Goodfellow et al., 2014) to f -divergences for implicitly learning unknown probability distributions through adversarial training.”
On Variational Bounds of Mutual Information
Poole, B., Ozair, S., Oord, A. V. D., Alemi, A. A., & Tucker, G. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.06922 · Cited by 480
Metadata
- Authors
- Nowozin, S., Cseke, B., & Tomioka, R.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1606.00709
- OpenAlex
- W2419501139
- Cited by
- 1,183
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2025: 32 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 218 · 2020: 262 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 11
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- f-divergence, generative adversarial training, marginalization, divergence functions, training complexity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
