DoReFa-Net: Training Low Bitwidth Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Bitwidth Gradients
Open accessAbstract
We propose DoReFa-Net, a method to train convolutional neural networks that have low bitwidth weights and activations using low bitwidth parameter gradients. In particular, during backward pass, parameter gradients are stochastically quantized to low bitwidth numbers before being propagated to convolutional layers. As convolutions during forward/backward passes can now operate on low bitwidth weights and activations/gradients respectively, DoReFa-Net can use bit convolution kernels to accelerate both training and inference. Moreover, as bit convolutions can be efficiently implemented on CPU, FPGA, ASIC and GPU, DoReFa-Net opens the way to accelerate training of low bitwidth neural network on these hardware. Our experiments on SVHN and ImageNet datasets prove that DoReFa-Net can achieve comparable prediction accuracy as 32-bit counterparts. For example, a DoReFa-Net derived from AlexNet that has 1-bit weights, 2-bit activations, can be trained from scratch using 6-bit gradients to get 46.1\% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet validation set. The DoReFa-Net AlexNet model is released publicly.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Researchers have proposed techniques for reducing transformers' size, latency and energy consumption for efficient inference for a wide range of applications.
“These challenges have motivated researchers to propose techniques for reducing transformers' size, latency and energy consumption for efficient inference for a wide range of applications.”
From A Survey of Techniques for Optimizing Transformer Inference (2023) · cites this paper as [42]
The methods for reducing transformers' size, latency and energy consumption include pruning, quantization, knowledge distillation and neural architecture search.
“The methods include pruning [40, 41], Quantization [42-44], Knowledge Distillation [45] and Neural Architecture Search [46].”
From A Survey of Techniques for Optimizing Transformer Inference (2023) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 1,690
- Authors
- Zhou, S., Wu, Y., Ni, Z., Zhou, X., Wen, H., & Zou, Y.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1606.06160
- OpenAlex
- W2469490737
- Cited by
- 1,690
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 173 · 2022: 190 · 2021: 327 · 2020: 337 · 2019: 232 · 2018: 181 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
- Keywords
- AlexNet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review